* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed long long
for the u64/s64 types, I would think.
In tools/kvm/ we are using our own u64/s64 definitions, not
glibc's, so i think it should be fine -
* Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a 'kvm nmi' command which can be used to trigger NMIs in
guests.
Mostly useful for debugging purposes.
Could we make this something like 'kvm debug nmi'?
We already have some debug functionality, right? Those should be
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 18:28 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
On 07/12/11 18:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.12.2011, at 08:19, Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 07/12/11 17:34, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 17:17 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
On 06/12/11 19:20, Sasha Levin wrote:
Am 06.12.2011 19:21, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2011-12-06 19:13, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.12.2011 20:57, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.12.2011 20:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-12-06 17:29, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
It appears there are two issues here, one is fixed by
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011, Orit Wasserman wrote about Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU
context for nested EPT:
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@
#define PFERR_RSVD_MASK (1U 3)
#define PFERR_FETCH_MASK (1U 4)
+#define EPT_WRITABLE_MASK 2
+#define EPT_EXEC_MASK 4
This is another
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/06/2011 09:15 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/06/2011 05:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Jason
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:21:06AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 14:38 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:56:58PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
* KVM tool manages the network completely itself (with DHCP support?),
no way to configure, except
On 07.12.2011 13:02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 06.12.2011 19:21, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
[]
For the 0.15 .. 1.0 change, the first commit which restores the (broken
in 0.15) functionality is this one:
commit 86fbf97ceb4a9c46a609dd4ae053ba4262b68fe8
Author: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Date:
This allows users to pass a pre-configured fd to use for the network
interface.
For example:
kvm run -n mode=tap,fd=3 3/dev/net/tap3
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Cc: Osier Yang jy...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
---
tools/kvm/builtin-run.c
On 12/07/2011 11:06 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011, Orit Wasserman wrote about Re: [PATCH 02/10] nEPT: MMU
context for nested EPT:
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@
#define PFERR_RSVD_MASK (1U 3)
#define PFERR_FETCH_MASK (1U 4)
+#define
On 12/06/2011 10:50 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Cc: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Somehow, the changelog became the place where people manage their cc lists.
+4.64 KVM_NMI
+
+Capability: basic
+Architectures: none
+Type: vcpu
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:42:55PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static void handle_nmi(int fd, u32 type, u32 len, u8 *msg)
+{
+ u32 vcpu = *(u32 *)msg;
+
+ ioctl(kvm_cpus[vcpu]-vcpu_fd, KVM_NMI);
You need to check that vcpu apic's LINT1 is configured to receive
NMI (and not masked
On 10/17/2011 06:00 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
From: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
Currently, NMI interrupt is blindly sent to all the vCPUs when NMI
button event happens. This doesn't properly emulate real hardware on
which NMI button event triggers LINT1. Because of this, NMI is sent to
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:42:55PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static void handle_nmi(int fd, u32 type, u32 len, u8 *msg)
+{
+ u32 vcpu = *(u32 *)msg;
+
+ ioctl(kvm_cpus[vcpu]-vcpu_fd, KVM_NMI);
You need to check that
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:31:11PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:42:55PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static void handle_nmi(int fd, u32 type, u32 len, u8 *msg)
+{
+ u32 vcpu = *(u32 *)msg;
+
+
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:58:37 +0800, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
multiple queue virtio-net: flow steering through host/guest cooperation
Hello all:
This is a rough series adds the guest/host cooperation of flow
steering support based on Krish Kumar's multiple queue virtio-net
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:31:11PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:42:55PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
+static void handle_nmi(int fd, u32
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:37:25PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:31:11PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:42:55PM
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 25 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 7945b0b..38f68ca 100644
---
On 12/06/2011 04:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Save the qemu-kvm release helper before deleting the kvm directory.
Thanks, applied.
Anything else useful remaining in /kvm? Otherwise I would release my
dinosaur extinction patch.
Are we clear on vgabios?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:41:50PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Yup, but while we support linux kernels only it should be fine. Still
of course on long term we need a check.
Tomorrow someone will send a patch to change how Linux behaves and
slightly older kvmtool will not be able to run
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
KVM_HC_KICK_CPU allows the calling vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt
state.
The presence of these hypercalls is indicated to guest via
On 12/06/2011 06:49 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:36:58PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 12/02/2011 01:20 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Have you tested it on AMD machines? There are some differences in the
hypercall infrastructure there.
Yes. 'll test on
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 12:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 25 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
On 12/06/2011 11:42 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
On 12/6/2011 5:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/06/2011 05:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com
wrote:
On
On 12/07/2011 07:10 AM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
On 12/6/2011 8:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 07:42:54AM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
On 12/6/2011 5:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com
wrote:
On
On 12/07/2011 03:30 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:58:37 +0800, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote:
multiple queue virtio-net: flow steering through host/guest cooperation
Hello all:
This is a rough series adds the guest/host cooperation of flow
steering support based on
On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
+/*
+ * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op: Kick a vcpu.
+ *
+ * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
+ */
+static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu =
On 12/07/2011 05:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
Consider the complexity of the host nic each with their own steering
features, this series make the first step with minimal effort to try to let
guest driver and host tap/macvtap co-operate like what physical nic does.
There may be
On 12/07/2011 01:02 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I don't see the QEMU patch doing a stop before grabbing LAPIC state. Or
does it happen somewhere before?
It got dropped on the floor; it's now in next.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:12 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 01:02 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I don't see the QEMU patch doing a stop before grabbing LAPIC state. Or
does it happen somewhere before?
It got dropped on the floor; it's now in next.
I was talking about that patch you
On 12/07/2011 02:20 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:12 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 01:02 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I don't see the QEMU patch doing a stop before grabbing LAPIC state. Or
does it happen somewhere before?
It got dropped on the floor; it's now in
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:24:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
+/*
+ * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op: Kick a vcpu.
+ *
+ * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
+ */
+static void
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:31 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 02:20 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:12 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 01:02 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I don't see the QEMU patch doing a stop before grabbing LAPIC state. Or
does it happen
On 12/07/2011 02:37 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
It's really implied by the fact that vcpu ioctls must be issued from the
same thread.
Oh, I totally forgot about that (here, and in my 'kvm nmi' patch).
It keeps biting people. We should make the kernel warn about it.
The reason it's important
On 12/07/2011 02:33 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Also Avi pointed that, logically kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate should
be called only in vcpu thread, so after further debugging, I noticed
that, setting vcpuN-mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; is not
necessary.
I 'll remove that in the
On 12/07/2011 09:16 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
That's what's happening here; we're __powerpc64__ and
!__KERNEL__, tools/kvm/include/linux/types.h includes
asm/types.h so gets the int-l64.h definition of __u64, as
above. :/
builtin-run.c:389: error: format `%llx' expects type `long
long
On 12/06/2011 02:03 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:58:21 +0200, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/06/2011 07:07 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Yes, but the hypervisor/trusted party would simply have to do the copy;
the rings themselves would be shared A would say copy
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 02:33 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Also Avi pointed that, logically kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate should
be called only in vcpu thread, so after further debugging, I noticed
that, setting vcpuN-mp_state =
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 20:23 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
[snip]
Rusty, Michael, does the below looks a reasonable optimization for you?
should I send it as a patch?
Something like the following patch:
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index
On 12/07/2011 10:29 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I also got another one, but it's **completely untested** (not even
compiled). Alex, Matt, any chance one of you can loan a temporary ppc
shell for the upcoming tests of KVM tool/ppc KVM?
qemu offers free ppc shells
--
error compiling committee.c:
On 12/07/2011 08:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.12.2011, at 01:32, Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 06/12/11 19:22, Sasha Levin wrote:
If KVM_RUN can actually return anything besides 0 or -1 it may be also
worthwhile to update Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt .
What are the
On 12/01/2011 08:30 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user, and its not too uncommon
for users to have several of these installed on same host.
This patch adds a
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:17 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:30 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user, and its not too uncommon
for users to have
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 10:29 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I also got another one, but it's **completely untested** (not even
compiled). Alex, Matt, any chance one of you can loan a temporary ppc
shell for the upcoming tests of KVM tool/ppc KVM?
On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:17 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:30 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user,
On 12/07/2011 04:22 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 10:29 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I also got another one, but it's **completely untested** (not even
compiled). Alex, Matt, any chance one of you can loan a temporary ppc
shell for
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:23 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:17 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:30 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization
On 12/07/2011 04:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
That's odd. IIRC when we discussed this with them, they were executing
VMXON/VMXOFF dynamically. Looks like they changed this.
Anyway, please adjust according to Joerg's comment (and add the word
using), and I'll apply.
I've seen it the
On 12/05/2011 10:19 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
When a host stops or suspends a VM it will set a flag to show this. The
watchdog will use these functions to determine if a softlockup is real, or the
result of a suspended VM.
+bool kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused(int cpu)
+{
+ bool ret
On 12/05/2011 10:19 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
Now that we have a flag that will tell the guest it was suspended, create an
interface for that communication using a KVM ioctl.
@@ -3295,6 +3295,10 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
goto out;
}
+ case
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user, and its not too uncommon
for users to have several of these installed on same host.
This patch adds a message to notify the user of the problem.
Currently we silently fail if SVM is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user, and its not too uncommon
for users to have several of these installed on same host.
This patch adds a message to notify the user of the problem.
On 12/05/2011 10:19 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/kvm_para.h b/include/asm-generic/kvm_para.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..177e1eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/kvm_para.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_KVM_PARA_H
+#define
On 12/05/2011 10:19 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
A suspended VM can cause spurious soft lockup warnings. To avoid these, the
watchdog now checks if the kernel knows it was stopped by the host and skips
the warning if so. When the watchdog is reset successfully, clear the guest
paused flag.
On 12/05/2011 10:18 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
Changes from V4:
Rename KVM_GUEST_PAUSED to KVMCLOCK_GUEST_PAUSED
Add description of KVMCLOCK_GUEST_PAUSED ioctl to api.txt
Changes from V3:
Include CC's on patch 3
Drop clear flag ioctl and have the watchdog clear the flag when it is reset
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:26 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
That's odd. IIRC when we discussed this with them, they were executing
VMXON/VMXOFF dynamically. Looks like they changed this.
Anyway, please adjust according to Joerg's comment (and
On 12/04/2011 07:36 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Switch to using memdup_user when possible. This makes code more
smaller and compact, and prevents errors.
Thanks, applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 12/07/2011 03:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Also I think we can keep the kicked flag in vcpu-requests, no need for
new storage.
Was going to suggest it but it violates the currently organized
processing of entries at the beginning of vcpu_enter_guest.
That is, this kicked flag is
On 07.12.2011, at 15:25, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:22 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 10:29 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
I also got another one, but it's **completely untested** (not even
compiled). Alex, Matt, any
On 07.12.2011, at 15:12, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011 08:44 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.12.2011, at 01:32, Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 06/12/11 19:22, Sasha Levin wrote:
If KVM_RUN can actually return anything besides 0 or -1 it may be also
worthwhile to
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011 05:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
[...]
Consider the complexity of the host nic each with their own steering
features, this series make the first step with minimal effort to try
to let
guest driver
On 12/07/2011 05:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Will do when I'm back on a keyboard ;).
Siri, write a patch for bugzilla #123456 and post it upstream.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a
Am 07.12.2011 15:34, schrieb Sasha Levin:
Currently we silently fail if VMX is already in use by a different
virtualization technology.
This is bad since it's non-obvious for the user, and its not too uncommon
for users to have several of these installed on same host.
This patch adds a
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:26 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
That's odd. IIRC when we discussed this with them, they were executing
VMXON/VMXOFF dynamically. Looks like they changed this.
Anyway, please adjust according to Joerg's comment (and
On 12/07/2011 05:15 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Ah, maybe they do it differently on AMD. Or they changed things.
I've grabbed their code just to see whats going on there and traced the
vmxon calls back to module init.
Are you sure it ever happened on-demand and not on init? If you are,
I'll
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:02:45PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 20:23 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
[snip]
Rusty, Michael, does the below looks a reasonable optimization for you?
OK overall but a bit hard to say for sure as it looks pretty incomplete ...
should I send it
In the vfio RFC thread there seemed to be convergence that some new
iommu_ops API is needed to set some platform specific aspects of an
iommu domain.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
[cut]
In that case, you should definitely be following what
On 07.12.2011, at 16:25, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:00 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.12.2011, at 15:25, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:22 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows users to pass a pre-configured fd to use for the network
interface.
For example:
kvm run -n mode=tap,fd=3 3/dev/net/tap3
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Cc: Osier Yang jy...@redhat.com
On 12/07/2011 06:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:24:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Yes you are right. It was potentially racy and it was harmful too!.
I had observed that it was stalling the CPU before I introduced
On 12/06/2011 11:05 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
Group 2: C0, C1, D0, D1, D2, D3
According to the SDM, the case 6 of em_grp2() should be treated as
undefined and the opcode D2/D3 should be decoded using the SrcCL.
emulate_2op_SrcB(ctxt, rcr);
break;
case
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:54:39AM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
Alex, Alexey I'm wondering if you've had any new thoughts on this over
the last week.
For Freescale, our iommu domain attributes would look something like:
-domain iova base address
-domain iova window size
I agree with
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:28:12PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows users to pass a pre-configured fd to use for the network
interface.
For example:
kvm run -n mode=tap,fd=3 3/dev/net/tap3
Cc:
On 12/07/2011 08:22 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2011 03:39 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Also I think we can keep the kicked flag in vcpu-requests, no need for
new storage.
Was going to suggest it but it violates the currently organized
processing of entries at the beginning of
On 12/06/2011 11:04 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
I removed em_grp1a() and em_grp9() but kept em_grp2() and em_grp45()
because they would produce a lot of trivial functions.
We could convert the various emulate_2op_blah() macros to generate
functions instead of statements, that would greatly
On 12/07/2011 06:51 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/06/2011 11:04 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
I removed em_grp1a() and em_grp9() but kept em_grp2() and em_grp45()
because they would produce a lot of trivial functions.
We could convert the various emulate_2op_blah() macros to generate
functions
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 19:31 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 12/07/2011 03:30 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:58:37 +0800, Jason Wangjasow...@redhat.com wrote:
multiple queue virtio-net: flow steering through host/guest cooperation
Hello all:
This is a rough series adds
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a 'kvm nmi' command which can be used to trigger NMIs in
guests.
Mostly useful for debugging purposes.
Could we make this something like 'kvm debug nmi'?
We already
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed long long
for the u64/s64 types, I would think.
In tools/kvm/ we are using our own u64/s64 definitions, not
glibc's, so
On 12/07/2011 09:16 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
That's what's happening here; we're __powerpc64__ and
!__KERNEL__, tools/kvm/include/linux/types.h includes
asm/types.h so gets the int-l64.h definition of __u64, as
above. :/
builtin-run.c:389: error: format `%llx' expects type `long
long
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:28:12PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows users to pass a pre-configured fd to use for the network
interface.
For example:
kvm run
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 19:13 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a 'kvm nmi' command which can be used to trigger NMIs in
guests.
Mostly useful for debugging purposes.
On 12/07/2011 01:35 AM, Matt Evans wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 07/12/11 05:03, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/05/2011 10:05 PM, Matt Evans wrote:
This patch adds a new arch directory, powerpc, basic file structure,
register
setup and where necessary stubs out arch-specific functions (e.g.
interrupts,
On 12/07/2011 10:38 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:54:39AM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
Alex, Alexey I'm wondering if you've had any new thoughts on this over
the last week.
For Freescale, our iommu domain attributes would look something like:
-domain iova base address
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:54:39AM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
Alex, Alexey I'm wondering if you've had any new thoughts on this over
the last week.
For Freescale, our iommu domain attributes would look something like:
Fix a typo where kvm-nrcpus was set, then immediately overwritten with
older value.
Signed-off-by: Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org
---
tools/kvm/builtin-run.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/kvm/builtin-run.c b/tools/kvm/builtin-run.c
index
On 08/12/11 05:31, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/07/2011 01:35 AM, Matt Evans wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 07/12/11 05:03, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/05/2011 10:05 PM, Matt Evans wrote:
This patch adds a new arch directory, powerpc, basic file structure,
register
setup and where necessary stubs out
Hi Sasha,
On 06/12/11 19:22, Sasha Levin wrote:
If KVM_RUN can actually return anything besides 0 or -1 it may be also
worthwhile to update Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt .
What are the cases where it happens?
It sounds like Alex is considering KVM PPC's return value in this case (and
On 08/12/11 04:14, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed long long
for the u64/s64 types, I would think.
In tools/kvm/ we are using our
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 08/12/11 04:14, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed long long
for the u64/s64 types,
On 08/12/11 15:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 08/12/11 04:14, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 14:03 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
Hi Sasha,
On 06/12/11 19:22, Sasha Levin wrote:
If KVM_RUN can actually return anything besides 0 or -1 it may be also
worthwhile to update Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt .
What are the cases where it happens?
It sounds like
On 08/12/11 15:56, Matt Evans wrote:
On 08/12/11 15:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 08/12/11 04:14, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
Since tools/kvm/include/linux/types.h only requires __u32,
__u64 et al from asm/types.h, wouldn't it be most
straightforward to just #include asm-generic/int-ll64.h?
This avoids #define __KERNEL__ breaking other includes brought
into userland, avoids
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder next-ppc44x while building
kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/builders/next-ppc44x/builds/374
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_kvm_1
Build Reason: The Nightly
On 08/12/11 16:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
Since tools/kvm/include/linux/types.h only requires __u32,
__u64 et al from asm/types.h, wouldn't it be most
straightforward to just #include asm-generic/int-ll64.h?
This avoids #define __KERNEL__ breaking other
Make sure 'exchanged' is initialized. Fixes the following warning:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function 'emulator_cmpxchg_emulated':
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:3794:7: warning: 'exchanged' may be used uninitialized in
this function
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |
* Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
[...] I haven't looked closely at Matt's
patches, but it should be possible to use [un]signed long long
for the u64/s64 types, I would think.
In tools/kvm/ we are using our own u64/s64 definitions, not
glibc's, so i think it should be fine -
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 18:28 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
On 07/12/11 18:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 07.12.2011, at 08:19, Matt Evans m...@ozlabs.org wrote:
On 07/12/11 17:34, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 17:17 +1100, Matt Evans wrote:
On 06/12/11 19:20, Sasha Levin wrote:
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
