Time for which the hrtimer is started for decrementer emulation is calculated
using tb_ticks_per_usec. While hrtimer uses the clockevent for DEC
reprogramming (if needed) and which calculate timebase ticks using the
multiplier and shifter mechanism implemented within clockevent layer. It was
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:24:17AM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:13 AM, shashank rachamalla
shashank.rachama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:20:04PM +0530, shashank rachamalla
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From
there we can potentially generate ASN.1 BER/DER visitors for the protocol
side, or potentially even just vmstate bindings as a start. I've recently
started looking into the
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:00:45PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, James.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:56:18AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
So if we're agreed no other devices going forwards should ever use this
interface, is there any point unifying the interface? No matter how
many
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42636
Alexandrov Stanislav n...@nya.ai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@nya.ai
---
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:47:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-03 18:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/29/2012 09:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Currently, MSI messages can only be injected to in-kernel irqchips by
defining a corresponding IRQ route for each message. This is not only
unhandy
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-03 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-03 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in
kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL.
This series depends on kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi
While restoring the hardware copies of guest SPRG4-7 registers we must use the
the lower 4 bytes of the 64 bit sotware copies maintained by KVM.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
A performance note: delivering an interrupt needs to search all vcpus
for an APIC ID match. The previous plan was to cache (or pre-calculate)
this lookup in the irq routing table. Now it looks like we'll need a
separate cache
On 04/03/2012 08:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
A performance note: delivering an interrupt needs to search all vcpus
for an APIC ID match. The previous plan was to cache (or pre-calculate)
this lookup in the irq routing table. Now it looks like we'll need a
separate cache for this.
From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
While restoring the hardware copies of guest SPRG4-7 registers we must use the
the lower 4 bytes of the 64 bit sotware copies maintained by KVM.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S |8
Change migration_multi_host test to migrate all vms on same time.
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/pull/270
Signed-off-by: Jiří Župka jzu...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/tests/migration_multi_host.py |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:44:23AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
A performance note: delivering an interrupt needs to search all vcpus
for an APIC ID match. The previous plan was to cache (or pre-calculate)
this lookup in the irq
disable_cb is just an optimization: it
can not guarantee that there are no callbacks.
I didn't yet figure out whether a callback
in freeze will trigger a bug, but disable_cb
won't address it in any case. So let's remove
the useless calls as a first step.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
On 2012-04-04 10:53, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:44:23AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
A performance note: delivering an interrupt needs to search all vcpus
for an APIC ID match. The previous plan was to cache (or
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:12:38PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin noticed that we could run the refill work after
ndo_close, which can re-enable napi - we don't disable it until
virtnet_remove. This is clearly wrong, so move the workqueue control
to ndo_open and ndo_stop (aka.
On 04/04/2012 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Until we do have this fast path we can just fill this value with zeros,
so kernel patch (almost) does not need to change for this -
just the header.
Partially implemented interfaces invite breakage.
Hmm true. OK scrap this idea then, it's
On 2012-04-04 11:36, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Until we do have this fast path we can just fill this value with zeros,
so kernel patch (almost) does not need to change for this -
just the header.
Partially implemented interfaces invite breakage.
Hmm true.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:32:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:12:38PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin noticed that we could run the refill work after
ndo_close, which can re-enable napi - we don't disable it until
virtnet_remove. This is
On 04/04/2012 12:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-04 11:36, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Until we do have this fast path we can just fill this value with zeros,
so kernel patch (almost) does not need to change for this -
just the header.
Partially
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:24:17AM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:13 AM, shashank rachamalla
shashank.rachama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:49:42PM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
tatus: RO
Content-Length: 2989
Lines: 79
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:24:17AM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:13 AM,
For Guest accessible SPRGs 4-7, save/restore must be handled differently for
64bit and
non-64 bit case. The registers are maintained as 64 bit copies by KVM. While
saving/restoring
for the non-64 bit case we should always take the lower 4 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
On 2012-04-04 11:55, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-04-04 11:36, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 12:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Until we do have this fast path we can just fill this value with zeros,
so kernel patch (almost) does not need to change for this
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach.
From
there we can potentially
On 04/03/2012 03:43 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/03/2012 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I'm afraid my notes are rather rough...
* 1.1
soft freeze apr 15th (less than two weeks)
hard freeze may 1
three months cycle for 1.2
stable machine types only every few releases? pc-next
* Maintainers,
On 04/04/2012 01:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I'm not so sure anymore. Sorry about the U turn, but remind me why? In
the long term it will be slower.
Likely not measurably slower. If you look at a message through the arch
glasses, you can usually spot the destination directly, specifically
On 04/04/2012 05:53 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach.
On 2012-04-04 13:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I'm not so sure anymore. Sorry about the U turn, but remind me why? In
the long term it will be slower.
Likely not measurably slower. If you look at a message through the arch
glasses, you can usually spot
On 04/04/2012 02:52 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/04/2012 05:53 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Attacking the
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:52:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:54:32PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
I got the spew at the bottom of the mail in a KVM guest using the KVM tools
and running trinity.
I'm not quite sure how default_idle managed to trigger
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:48:23 +0900
Takuya Yoshikawa takuya.yoshik...@gmail.com wrote:
By removing sptep from rmap_iterator, I could achieve 15% performance
improvement without inlining.
Takuya Yoshikawa (3):
KVM: MMU: Make pte_list_desc fit cache lines well
KVM: MMU: Improve iteration
On 04/04/2012 02:14 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com
mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:30:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:52:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:54:32PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
I got the spew at the bottom of the mail in a KVM guest using the KVM
tools and running
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:04:16AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:30:33PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:52:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:54:32PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
I got the spew at
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:21:26PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On 04/04/2012 02:14 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com
Hi Bjorn,
Did you have chance to look at this one?
Regards,
Tadeusz
On 01/03/12 17:18, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.st...@intel.com
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:38:18 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed warning
This patch fixes the following warning.
# virsh start
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:52:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:54:32PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi all,
I got the spew at the bottom of the mail in a KVM guest using the KVM
tools and running
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tadeusz Struk tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Did you have chance to look at this one?
Yep. It needs a changelog. Fixed warning is inadequate. It needs
an explanation of what the VF connection is. It would also be nice if
you fixed the function
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:49:42PM +0530, shashank rachamalla wrote:
tatus: RO
Content-Length: 2989
Lines: 79
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:24:17AM +0530,
We've hit a kernel host panic, when issuing a 'system_reset' with an
82576 nic assigned and a Windows guest. Host system is a PowerEdge R815.
[Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 32993
[Hardware Error]: APEI generic hardware error status
[Hardware Error]:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 about 22:12:36 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
I've starting seeing soft lockups resulting from smp_call_function()
calls. I've attached two different backtraces of this happening with
different code paths.
This is running inside a KVM guest with the trinity fuzzer, using
Time for which the hrtimer is started for decrementer emulation is calculated
using tb_ticks_per_usec. While hrtimer uses the clockevent for DEC
reprogramming (if needed) and which calculate timebase ticks using the
multiplier and shifter mechanism implemented within clockevent layer. It was
From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
For Guest accessible SPRGs 4-7, save/restore must be handled differently for
64bit and
non-64 bit case. The registers are maintained as 64 bit copies by KVM. While
saving/restoring
for the non-64 bit case we should always take the lower 4 bytes.
From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
While restoring the hardware copies of guest SPRG4-7 registers we must use the
the lower 4 bytes of the 64 bit sotware copies maintained by KVM.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S |8
47 matches
Mail list logo
