Hello,
[0.248962] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1+ #24
[penberg@tux ~]$ cat perf-kvmtool-issue
Hello,
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks boot.
Pekka
[penberg@tux
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:01:58AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hello,
[0.248962] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1+ #24
[penberg@tux ~]$ cat perf-kvmtool-issue
Hello,
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:07:43AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:01:58AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hello,
[0.248962] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1+ #24
[penberg@tux ~]$ cat perf-kvmtool-issue
Hello,
Has anyone seen this? It's
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:01:58AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hello,
[0.248962] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1+ #24
[penberg@tux ~]$ cat perf-kvmtool-issue
Hello,
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks boot.
I think you're the first.. I don't normally use kvm if I can at all
avoid it.
But I think its a 'simple'
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks boot.
I think you're the first.. I don't normally use kvm if I
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks boot.
I think you're the first.. I don't normally use kvm if I can
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:41:53AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks
On 08/16/2012 10:41 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on virtualized CPU which breaks boot.
I think you're
On 08/16/2012 10:46 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:41:53AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h index 3c14202..da71c84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
/* Select powerpc specific features in linux/kvm.h */ #define
__KVM_HAVE_SPAPR_TCE
On 08/15/2012 08:53 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/14/2012 06:51 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Userspace may want to modify the ROM (for example, when programming a
flash device). It is also possible to map an hva range rw
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:45:52AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Yan, Zheng
zheng.z@linux.intel.com wrote:
The Intel uncore doc does not specify how to check if uncore exist.
How about disabling uncore on virtualized CPU?
(CC'ing Avi.)
Why not
On 08/16/2012 08:14 AM, Xudong Hao wrote:
Enable KVM FPU fully eager restore, if there is other FPU state which isn't
tracked by
CR0.TS bit.
Tested with these cases:
1) SpecCPU2000 workload( 1 VM, 2 VMs)
2) Program for floating point caculate
Is the motivation performance or correctness?
On 08/16/2012 01:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c
index c8c6157..ea57631
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov gorcu...@openvz.org wrote:
Most users just install a distro, they don't mess with kernel command lines.
The command line option might be added implicitly in qemu/lkvm.
That does not make sense for QEMU and we want less mandatory command line
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|3.2.2-gentoo|3.4
--- Comment #16
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Avi Kivity
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:08 PM
To: Hao, Xudong
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
On
On 16.08.2012, at 05:37, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
Patch to access the debug registers (IACx/DACx) using ONE_REG api
was sent earlier. But that missed the respective documentation.
Also corrected the index number referencing in section 4.69
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan
On 16.08.2012, at 11:11, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 01:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c
Hi,
We run a cloud hosting provider using qemu-kvm 1.1, and are keen to find a
contractor to track down and fix problems we have with large memory Windows
guests booting very slowly - they can take several hours.
We previously reported these problems in July (copied below) and they are
still
On 08/16/2012 11:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 10:41 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 10:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Has anyone seen this? It's kvmtool/next with 3.6.0-rc1. Looks like we
are doing uncore_init() on
With these patches applied, I can successfully run a guest on my 460EX
board. So this is the official revival of the 440 KVM target ;-).
As a sidenote: These patches are required because I'm running on a
newer chip than the original development was based on. If you are on an
older 440 CPU that
We need mfdcrx to execute properly on 460 cores.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
v1 - v2:
- rework mfdcr into a function
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c | 74 +++-
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git
When running on HV aware hosts, we can not trap when the guest sets the FP
bit, so we just let it do so when it wants to, because it has full access to
MSR.
For non-HV aware hosts with an FPU (like 440), we need to also adjust the
shadow MSR though. Otherwise the guest gets an FP unavailable trap
We need mtdcrx to execute properly on 460 cores.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
v1 - v2:
- rework mtdcr into a function
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_emulate.c | 36 +++-
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 14:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Another option is to deal with them on the host side. That has the
benefit of working with non-Linux guests too.
Right, its an insane amount of MSRs though, but it could be done if
someone takes the time to enumerate them all.
If KVM then
On 08/16/2012 12:48 PM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Avi Kivity
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:08 PM
To: Hao, Xudong
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/fpu:
On 08/16/2012 02:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 14:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Another option is to deal with them on the host side. That has the
benefit of working with non-Linux guests too.
Right, its an insane amount of MSRs though, but it could be done if
someone
On 08/16/2012 01:47 PM, Richard Davies wrote:
Hi,
We run a cloud hosting provider using qemu-kvm 1.1, and are keen to find a
contractor to track down and fix problems we have with large memory Windows
guests booting very slowly - they can take several hours.
We previously reported these
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:59 PM
To: Hao, Xudong
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao; Roedel, Joerg
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
On 08/16/2012 12:48 PM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
From: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
In handling the H_CEDE hypercall, if this vcpu has already been
prodded (with the H_PROD hypercall, which Linux guests don't in fact
use), we branch to a numeric label '1f'. Unfortunately there is
another '1:' label before the one that we want to jump to.
When we map a page that wasn't icache cleared before, do so when first
mapping it in KVM using the same information bits as the Linux mapping
logic. That way we are 100% sure that any page we map does not have stale
entries in the icache.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
Hi Avi,
This is my patch queue for ppc patches that should go into 3.6. Please pull.
* Fix memset in e500_tlb
* Fix icache flush when mapping executable pages
* Fix wrong branch in book3s hv code
Alex
The following changes since commit 439793d4b3c99e550daebd868bbd58967c93d0b3:
Gleb
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
Put the parameters the right way around
Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Reported-by: David Binderman dcb...@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:59 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 22:22 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:28 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:37:08PM -0600,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:34:52AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
So I'm inclined to say source IDs are a requirement for shared
interrupts.
Can yo show a specific example that breaks?
I don't think it can exist.
Only the edge vs level interaction if we define the policy
Hallo
I have a kvm vm that I am attempting to boot from pxe. The dhcp works perfectly
and I can see the VM in the pxe server arp. but the tftp just times out. I
don't see any tftp traffic on either the physical host or on the pie server. I
am using a bridged interface. I have tried using
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Holway a.hol...@syseleven.de wrote:
I have a kvm vm that I am attempting to boot from pxe. The dhcp works
perfectly and I can see the VM in the pxe server arp. but the tftp just times
out. I don't see any tftp traffic on either the physical host or on
There are no other dependencies of device assignment except for
CONFIG_KVM and an x86 target. So there is also no point in controlling
this feature via configure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
configure | 11 ---
hw/i386/Makefile.objs |2 +-
2
Encapsulate the ugly check if MSI-X assignment is supported in a
separate helper function.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |5 +
target-i386/kvm.c |7 +++
target-i386/kvm_i386.h |1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4
The refactored version cleanly hides the KVM IOCTL structure from the
users and also zeros out the padding field.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |7 ++-
qemu-kvm.c |8
qemu-kvm.h |4
Avoid passing kvm_assigned_irq on INTx assignment and separate this
function from (to-be-refactored) MSI/MSI-X assignment.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c | 16 ++--
target-i386/kvm.c | 24
Introduce three new KVM services, kvm_device_intx/msi/msix_deassign, to
release assigned interrupts. These no longer require to pass
pre-initialized kvm_assigned_irq structures but only request required
parameters.
To trace which type of interrupt is currently assigned, use a new enum
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/kvm/pci-assign.c | 181 +-
1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
index 3611539..cfd859e 100644
---
In contrast to the old wrappers, the new ones only take the required
parameters instead of a preinitialized kvm_assigned_pci_dev structure.
We also move the dev_id generation into kvm_device_pci_assign and store
the result in the AssignedDevice structure. It will serve as handle for
all upcoming
This is more appropriate and allows central handling.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/kvm/pci-assign.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
index cfd859e..29a4671 100644
---
Use kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route and introduce kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route
to set up the required IRQ routes for MSI-X injections. This removes the
last direct interaction with the IRQ routing API of the KVM kernel so
that we can remove/unexport related services.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Introduce kvm_device_msi_assign and use upstream's
kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route/kvm_irqchip_release_virq to provide MSI
support for assigned devices.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c | 54 +--
target-i386/kvm.c
The refactored version cleanly hides the KVM IOCTL structure from the
users and also zeros out the padding field.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |7 ++-
qemu-kvm.c |5 -
qemu-kvm.h |1 -
target-i386/kvm.c
Move kvm_device_intx_set_mask prototype and implementation to their
upstream positions.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
qemu-kvm.c |9 -
qemu-kvm.h |2 --
target-i386/kvm.c |9 +
target-i386/kvm_i386.h |1 +
4
Avoid passing kvm_assigned_irq on MSI-X assignment. Drop kvm_assign_irq
as it's now no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |9 +
qemu-kvm.c | 27 ---
qemu-kvm.h | 11 ---
Hurray!
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |1 -
kvm-all.c |3 ---
kvm.h |7 ---
qemu-kvm.c | 37 -
qemu-kvm.h | 37
Remove remainders of previous refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/kvm/pci-assign.c |9 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
index 29a4671..4f5daf3 100644
--- a/hw/kvm/pci-assign.c
The previous name may incorrectly suggest that this function assigns all
types of IRQs though it's only dealing with legacy interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
Move device-assignment.c into hw/kvm, calling it pci-assign.c now, just
like its device name.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/i386/Makefile.objs|3 ---
hw/kvm/Makefile.objs |2 +-
hw/{device-assignment.c =
With this series, we are getting very close to obsoleting qemu-kvm. It
refactors hw/device-assignment.c and the associated KVM helper functions
into a form that should allow merging them into QEMU. Once the series is
acceptable for qemu-kvm, I will break out the necessary uq/master
patches and
VersionableClass provides class hierarchy which automatically select
right version of class. Class manipulation is used for this reason.
Closer description is in autotest/client/shared/base_utils.py
class VersionableClass
Working example is in autotest/client/shared/base_utils_unittest.py
Le Thursday 16 Aug 2012 à 11:47:27 (+0100), Richard Davies a écrit :
Hi,
We run a cloud hosting provider using qemu-kvm 1.1, and are keen to find a
contractor to track down and fix problems we have with large memory Windows
guests booting very slowly - they can take several hours.
We
On 8/16/12 5:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
If you don't mind printing a warning every time a Linux guest boots ;-)
That feature already exists today for perf related probing. e.g.,
[585929.678746] kvm [10752]: vcpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x345
[585929.709870] kvm_set_msr_common: 54 callbacks
On 08/16/2012 04:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
With this series, we are getting very close to obsoleting qemu-kvm. It
refactors hw/device-assignment.c and the associated KVM helper functions
into a form that should allow merging them into QEMU. Once the series is
acceptable for qemu-kvm, I will
On 2012-08-16 16:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 04:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
With this series, we are getting very close to obsoleting qemu-kvm. It
refactors hw/device-assignment.c and the associated KVM helper functions
into a form that should allow merging them into QEMU. Once the series
On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
We are using logical volumes and the cache is set to 'none'.
Strange, that should work without any buffering.
What the contents of
/sys/block/sda/queue/hw_sector_size
and
/sys/block/sda/queue/logical_block_size
?
Hi Avi,
Instead of populating the the entire register file, read in registers
as they are accessed, and write back only the modified ones. This
saves a VMREAD and VMWRITE on Intel (for rsp, since it is not usually
used during emulation), and a two 128-byte copies for the registers.
Signed-off-by: Avi
On 08/16/2012 05:54 PM, Martin Wawro wrote:
On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
We are using logical volumes and the cache is set to 'none'.
Strange, that should work without any buffering.
What the contents of
/sys/block/sda/queue/hw_sector_size
and
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Holway a.hol...@syseleven.de wrote:
I have a kvm vm that I am attempting to boot from pxe. The dhcp works
perfectly and I can see the VM in the pxe server arp. but the tftp just
times out. I don't
The following series implements KVM support for ARM processors,
specifically on the Cortex A-15 platform. Work is done in
collaboration between Columbia University, Virtual Open Systems and
ARM/Linaro.
The patch series applies to kvm/next, specifically commit:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
The KVM hypervisor mmu code requires access to the mem_type prot_pte
field when setting up page tables pointing to a device. Unfortunately,
the mem_type structure is opaque.
Add an accessor (get_mem_type_prot_pte()) to retrieve the prot_pte
value.
Select this option for ARM processors equipped with hardware
Virtualization Extensions.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall c.d...@virtualopensystems.com
---
arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index
Add a HYP pgd to the core code (so it can benefit all Linux
hypervisors).
Populate this pgd with an identity mapping of the code contained
in the .hyp.idmap.text section
Offer a method to drop the this identity mapping through
hyp_idmap_teardown and re-create it through hyp_idmap_setup.
Make
From: Rusty Russell rusty.russ...@linaro.org
We want some of these for use in KVM, so pull them out of
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c into their own asm/perf_bits.h.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell rusty.russ...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/include/asm/perf_bits.h | 56
Targets KVM support for Cortex A-15 processors.
Contains all the framework components, make files, header files and some
tracing functionality.
Only supported core is Cortex-A15 for now.
Contains minor reset hook driven from kvm_vcpu_set_target, which will
eventually be a custom ARM ioctl to
Sets up the required registers to run code in HYP-mode from the kernel.
By setting the HVBAR the kernel can execute code in Hyp-mode with
the MMU disabled. The HVBAR initially points to initialization code,
which initializes other Hyp-mode registers and enables the MMU
for Hyp-mode. Afterwards,
This commit introduces the framework for guest memory management
through the use of 2nd stage translation. Each VM has a pointer
to a level-1 table (the pgd field in struct kvm_arch) which is
used for the 2nd stage translations. Entries are added when handling
guest faults (later patch) and the
From: Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu
Userspace can inject IRQs and FIQs through the KVM_IRQ_LINE VM ioctl.
This ioctl is used since the sematics are in fact two lines that can be
either raised or lowered on the VCPU - the IRQ and FIQ lines.
KVM needs to know which VCPU it must operate on
Provides complete world-switch implementation to switch to other guests
running in non-secure modes. Includes Hyp exception handlers that
capture necessary exception information and stores the information on
the VCPU and KVM structures.
The following Hyp-ABI is also documented in the code:
Adds a new important function in the main KVM/ARM code called
handle_exit() which is called from kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() on returns
from guest execution. This function examines the Hyp-Syndrome-Register
(HSR), which contains information telling KVM what caused the exit from
the guest.
Some of
Handles the guest faults in KVM by mapping in corresponding user pages
in the 2nd stage page tables.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall c.d...@virtualopensystems.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h |9
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h |
When the guest accesses I/O memory this will create data abort
exceptions and they are handled by decoding the HSR information
(physical address, read/write, length, register) and forwarding reads
and writes to QEMU which performs the device emulation.
Certain classes of load/store operations do
From: Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu
When the guest executes a WFI instruction the operation is trapped to
KVM, which emulates the instruction in software. There is no correlation
between a guest executing a WFI instruction and actually putting the
hardware into a low-power mode, since a
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Holway a.hol...@syseleven.de wrote:
On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Holway a.hol...@syseleven.de wrote:
I have a kvm vm that I am attempting to boot from pxe. The dhcp works
perfectly and I
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:31 AM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
ag...@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: booke/bookehv: Add guest debug support
On 07/30/2012
I'd be interested in working on this.. What I'd like to propose is to write
an automated regression test harness that will reboot the host hardware, and
start booting up guest VMs and report the time-to-boot, as well as relative
performance of the running VMs.
For best results, I'd need access to
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:03:01PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/15/2012 08:53 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:44:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/14/2012 06:51 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Userspace may want to modify the ROM (for example, when programming a
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:49:11PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 08/14/2012 11:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:58:07AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 08/14/2012 01:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:36:20AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:34:51PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 04:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
With this series, we are getting very close to obsoleting qemu-kvm. It
refactors hw/device-assignment.c and the associated KVM helper functions
into a form that should allow merging them
On 08/16/2012 06:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Correct. But the chipset is also able to to write-protect some ranges
in the 0xc-0x10 area via the PAM. It is able to write-protect
both RAM and PCI memory (usually mapped to flash).
You are convinced that adding read-write
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 15:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The refactored version cleanly hides the KVM IOCTL structure from the
users and also zeros out the padding field.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |7 ++-
qemu-kvm.c |8
On 2012-08-16 18:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 15:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The refactored version cleanly hides the KVM IOCTL structure from the
users and also zeros out the padding field.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
hw/device-assignment.c |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:29:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/15/2012 10:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:28 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:37:08PM -0600, Alex
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 19:32 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/11/2012 01:37 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
v8:
Trying a new approach. Nobody seems to like the internal IRQ
source ID object and the interactions it implies between irqfd
and eoifd, so let's get rid of it. Instead, simply
On 2012-08-16 18:30, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-16 18:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 15:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The refactored version cleanly hides the KVM IOCTL structure from the
users and also zeros out the padding field.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 19:29 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/15/2012 10:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:28 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:37:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson
On 08/11/2012 01:37 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
v8:
Trying a new approach. Nobody seems to like the internal IRQ
source ID object and the interactions it implies between irqfd
and eoifd, so let's get rid of it. Instead, simply expose
IRQ source IDs to userspace. This lets the user be in
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 15:54 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
With this series, we are getting very close to obsoleting qemu-kvm. It
refactors hw/device-assignment.c and the associated KVM helper functions
into a form that should allow merging them into QEMU. Once the series is
acceptable for qemu-kvm,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 19:34 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 07:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
+int kvm_device_msix_set_vector(KVMState *s, uint32_t dev_id, uint32_t
vector,
+ int virq)
+{
+struct kvm_assigned_msix_entry msix_entry = {
+
On 08/15/2012 10:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:36:31AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 17:28 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:37:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
v8:
Trying a new approach. Nobody seems to
On 08/16/2012 07:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:39:35PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/16/2012 07:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
What if a level irqfd shares a line with a KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl? Then an
EOI can de-assert the irqfd source, but the line is kept
On 08/16/2012 07:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
What if a level irqfd shares a line with a KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl? Then an
EOI can de-assert the irqfd source, but the line is kept high by the
last KVM_IRQ_LINE invocation.
Exactly. So 1 ID for userspace and 1 for irqfd.
Gaa, this mess
On 08/16/2012 07:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
+int kvm_device_msix_set_vector(KVMState *s, uint32_t dev_id, uint32_t
vector,
+ int virq)
+{
+struct kvm_assigned_msix_entry msix_entry = {
+.assigned_dev_id = dev_id,
+.gsi = virq,
+
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
