On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:12:43AM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 13.09.2013 um 21:21 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
In hardware there is in fact an LPCR per hardware CPU thread, though
the architecture says that on threaded processors many of the fields
have to be the same
On 2013-09-13 19:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/09/2013 04:04, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
+preempt_val_l1 = delta_tsc_l1 preempt_scale;
+if (preempt_val_l2 = preempt_val_l1)
+preempt_val_l2 = 0;
+else
+preempt_val_l2 -= preempt_val_l1;
+
Am 14.09.2013 um 00:58 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:12:43AM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 13.09.2013 um 21:21 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
In hardware there is in fact an LPCR per hardware CPU thread, though
the architecture says
Take CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS from arm32, but set the default to 8.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig| 11 +++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index 741f66a2edbd7..9ebf8ac3a12ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int
Drop the _ARM_ part of the name. We can then introduce a config option
like this to aarch64 and other arches using the same name - allowing
grep to show them all. Also update the help text to describe the option
more completely.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
Andrew Jones (3):
arm: kvm: clamp NR_VCPUS to MAX_VCPUS
arm32: kvm: rename CONFIG_KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS
aarch64: kvm: introduce CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 8
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c| 2 +-
Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index 741f66a2edbd7..9ebf8ac3a12ff 100644
---
This patch removes KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS and uses num_online_cpus() for
KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS instead, as ARM does. While the API doc simply says
KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS should return the recommended maximum number of vcpus,
it has been returning KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS, which was defined as the
maximum tested number
Take CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS from arm32, but set the default to 255.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig| 10 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2013-09-14 13:14, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 07:14:02AM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Can anyone please let me know links providing \
info about ongoing/future kvm feature \
development?is the todo list in the main page upto date?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:17 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Aneesh and I are currently investigating an alternative approach,
which is much more like the x86 way of doing things. We are looking
at splitting the code into three modules: a
Am 14.09.2013 um 13:33 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:17 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Aneesh and I are currently investigating an alternative approach,
which is much more like
Am 14.09.2013 um 00:24 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:01:37PM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.08.2013, at 23:27, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Currently we request write access to all pages that get mapped into the
guest, even if the guest is only loading
Am 14.09.2013 um 00:58 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:12:43AM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 13.09.2013 um 21:21 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
In hardware there is in fact an LPCR per hardware CPU thread, though
the architecture says
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:17 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Aneesh and I are currently investigating an alternative approach,
which is much more like the x86 way of doing things. We are looking
at splitting the code into three modules: a
Am 14.09.2013 um 13:33 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:17 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Aneesh and I are currently investigating an alternative approach,
which is much more like
Am 14.09.2013 um 00:24 schrieb Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:01:37PM -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.08.2013, at 23:27, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Currently we request write access to all pages that get mapped into the
guest, even if the guest is only loading
20 matches
Mail list logo
