Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@web.de):
Looks consistent to me.
It's working for me, so if there are no further comments I'll improve
the changelog and send to lkml.
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/13/2011 04:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@web.de):
Looks consistent to me.
It's working for me, so if there are no further comments
Looks good to me too.
I'll improve
the changelog and send to lkml.
kvm
When doing a soft int, we need to bump eip before pushing it to
the stack. Otherwise we'll do the int a second time.
[a...@canonical.com: merged eip update as per Jan's recommendation.]
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft a...@canonical.com
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/09/2011 12:09 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Hi,
at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090, it was
found that emulate_int_real() sometimes pushes the wrong eip when doing a
int. Whereas with non-kvm qemu we push the next
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/12/2011 10:53 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/09/2011 12:09 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Hi,
at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090, it was
found that emulate_int_real
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/12/2011 10:53 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/09/2011 12:09 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Hi,
at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090, it was
found that emulate_int_real
Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@siemens.com):
On 2011-04-12 16:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/12/2011 05:12 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/12/2011 10:53 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com):
On 04/09/2011 12:09 AM
processing
them (e.g. a page fault while accessing the IDT).
Jan
Ok, thanks guys. I'm currently trying a compile of the following.
From a3c4d5b67eb6d91ef772bc0e04adcd7d9711275f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:18:40 +0100
Subject
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (se...@hallyn.com):
Quoting Jan Kiszka (jan.kis...@web.de):
From a brief refresh-reading, I would say
if (interrupt.soft || kvm_exception_is_soft(nr))
increment_eip_by_inst_len
but only for those interrupts/exceptions which were raised by the
triggering
Hi,
at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/747090, it was
found that emulate_int_real() sometimes pushes the wrong eip when doing a
int. Whereas with non-kvm qemu we push the next instruction after the
int, with kvm we push the addr of the instruction itself.
I thought it'd
Thanks, Stefan. That patch actually doesn't compile for me, because
it leaves references in hw/pckbd.c to both ioport92_write and
ioport92_read, which it deletes from there. Should ioport92_read
just be renamed to outport_read instead of delted, and the remaining
references changed to
Hi,
I don't see this patch in the git tree, nor a revert of the buggy
commit. Was any decision made on this?
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
12 matches
Mail list logo
