On 03/11/2015 22:17, William Dauchy wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I was wondering it this could be a valid candidate for -stable, don't you
> think?
> (commit ba60c41)
Certainly, feel free to propose it to sta...@vger.kernel.org!
Paolo
> Best regards,
>
> On Sep02 12:33, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>
On 03/11/2015 22:17, William Dauchy wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I was wondering it this could be a valid candidate for -stable, don't you
> think?
> (commit ba60c41)
Indeed, feel free to propose it!
Paolo
> Best regards,
>
> On Sep02 12:33, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> We were taking the exit path
Hi Paolo,
I was wondering it this could be a valid candidate for -stable, don't you think?
(commit ba60c41)
Best regards,
On Sep02 12:33, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We were taking the exit path after checking ue->flags and return value
> of setup_routing_entry(), but 'e' was not freed incase of a
On 02/09/2015 09:03, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We were taking the exit path after checking ue->flags and return value
> of setup_routing_entry(), but 'e' was not freed incase of a failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
> ---
> virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 8 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions
We were taking the exit path after checking ue->flags and return value
of setup_routing_entry(), but 'e' was not freed incase of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/