On 10/15/09 09:17, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Ed Swierk wrote:
Overall it seems pretty solid for Linux PV-on-HVM guests. I think more
work is needed to support full PV guests, but I don't know how much.
Have folks been asking about PV-on-HVM or full PV?
Not all requests weren't that concrete /wrt
Ed Swierk wrote:
Thanks for the feedback; I'll post a new version shortly.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
Interesting stuff. How usable is your work at this point? I've no
immediate demand, but the question if one could integrate Xen guests
with KVM
Ed Swierk wrote:
As we discussed a while back, support for Xen PV-on-HVM guests can be
implemented almost entirely in userspace, except for handling one
annoying MSR that maps a Xen hypercall blob into guest address space.
A generic mechanism to delegate MSR writes to userspace seems
Thanks for the feedback; I'll post a new version shortly.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
Interesting stuff. How usable is your work at this point? I've no
immediate demand, but the question if one could integrate Xen guests
with KVM already popped up more
As we discussed a while back, support for Xen PV-on-HVM guests can be
implemented almost entirely in userspace, except for handling one
annoying MSR that maps a Xen hypercall blob into guest address space.
A generic mechanism to delegate MSR writes to userspace seems overkill
and risks
