(2010/11/18 14:45), Zachary Amsden wrote:
No, I believe your patch is correct and the lock should be there. Did you test
with spinlock debugging just to be sure?
Sorry but no.
I have no experience with cpu hotplug.
So I thought it would take too much time to do real test by myself and
On 11/15/2010 10:35 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by kvm_lock.
This patch adds missing protection for CPU_DYING case.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawayoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2
(2010/11/18 10:59), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/15/2010 10:35 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by kvm_lock.
This patch adds missing protection for CPU_DYING case.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawayoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
---
On 11/17/2010 04:04 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
(2010/11/18 10:59), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/15/2010 10:35 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by kvm_lock.
This patch adds missing protection for CPU_DYING case.
Signed-off-by: Takuya
(2010/11/18 11:33), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/17/2010 04:04 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
(2010/11/18 10:59), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/15/2010 10:35 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by kvm_lock.
This patch adds missing protection for
On 11/17/2010 04:41 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
(2010/11/18 11:33), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/17/2010 04:04 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
(2010/11/18 10:59), Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/15/2010 10:35 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by
In kvm_cpu_hotplug(), only CPU_STARTING case is protected by kvm_lock.
This patch adds missing protection for CPU_DYING case.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa yoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
