On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
From: David Matlack dmatl...@google.com
vcpu exits and memslot mutations can run concurrently as long as the
vcpu does not aquire the slots mutex. Thus it is theoretically possible
for memslots to change underneath a
Il 02/09/2014 18:44, David Matlack ha scritto:
-#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT 19
-#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT 9
-#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK ((1 MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 1)
+#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT 20
+#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 02/09/2014 18:44, David Matlack ha scritto:
-#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT 19
-#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT 9
-#define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK ((1 MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 1)
+#define
From: David Matlack dmatl...@google.com
vcpu exits and memslot mutations can run concurrently as long as the
vcpu does not aquire the slots mutex. Thus it is theoretically possible
for memslots to change underneath a vcpu that is handling an exit.
If we increment the memslot generation number
