On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 8/26/15 1:19 AM, David Matlack wrote:
Thanks for writing v2, Wanpeng.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com
wrote:
There is a downside of halt_poll_ns since poll is still
On 8/28/15 12:25 AM, David Matlack wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 8/26/15 1:19 AM, David Matlack wrote:
Thanks for writing v2, Wanpeng.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com
wrote:
There is a
Hi David,
On 8/26/15 1:19 AM, David Matlack wrote:
Thanks for writing v2, Wanpeng.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
There is a downside of halt_poll_ns since poll is still happen for idle
VCPU which can waste cpu usage. This patch adds the ability to
On 8/26/15 1:19 AM, David Matlack wrote:
Thanks for writing v2, Wanpeng.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
There is a downside of halt_poll_ns since poll is still happen for idle
VCPU which can waste cpu usage. This patch adds the ability to adjust
Thanks for writing v2, Wanpeng.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
There is a downside of halt_poll_ns since poll is still happen for idle
VCPU which can waste cpu usage. This patch adds the ability to adjust
halt_poll_ns dynamically.
What testing have
There is a downside of halt_poll_ns since poll is still happen for idle
VCPU which can waste cpu usage. This patch adds the ability to adjust
halt_poll_ns dynamically.
There are two new kernel parameters for changing the halt_poll_ns:
halt_poll_ns_grow and halt_poll_ns_shrink. A third new
