Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Yes. master
okay, will get testing this later next week. Any chance you can provide
some packet-per-second numbers (netperf udp stream with small packets)?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:34:39PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Yes. master
okay, will get testing this later next week. Any chance you can provide
some packet-per-second numbers (netperf udp stream with small packets)?
Or.
If you do, maybe you should apply the
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
The patches are against 2.6.31-rc4. I'd like them to go into linux-next
and down the road 2.6.32 if possible. Please comment.
Hi Michael,
Just wanted to make sure with you how this can be tested, is 2.6.31-rc4
plus these two patches enough to form the kernel part?
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
No, these patches are on top of Avi's kvm.git
so are they on top of some branch in Avi's kvm.git which is planned to
be merged for 2.6.32? what branch should I use?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:44:02PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
No, these patches are on top of Avi's kvm.git
so are they on top of some branch in Avi's kvm.git which is planned to
be merged for 2.6.32? what branch should I use?
Yes. master
Or.
--
To unsubscribe
This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio,
The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization
overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path,
without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to
4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for
