On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:03:30PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:54:26AM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Virtio-net code makes assumption about virtqueue descriptor layout
(e.g. sg[0] is the header, sg[1] is the data
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:38:14PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:03:30PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:54:26AM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Virtio-net code makes assumption about virtqueue
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:54:26AM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Virtio-net code makes assumption about virtqueue descriptor layout
(e.g. sg[0] is the header, sg[1] is the data buffer).
This patch makes code not rely on the layout of descriptors.
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Virtio-net code makes assumption about virtqueue descriptor layout
(e.g. sg[0] is the header, sg[1] is the data buffer).
This patch makes code not rely on the layout of descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Amos
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:54:26AM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Virtio-net code makes assumption about virtqueue descriptor layout
(e.g. sg[0] is the header, sg[1] is the data buffer).
This patch makes code not rely on the layout of descriptors.
