Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-20 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-20 Thread Ayal Baron
- Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote: Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-20 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/20/2010 04:18 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Dor Laor
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14 planning - threadlet work - virtfs proposals - Live snapshots - We were asked to add this feature for

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14 planning - threadlet work - virtfs proposals - Live snapshots

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Dor Laor
On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14 planning - threadlet

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/19/2010 02:58 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 08:03 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:58 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14 planning - threadlet work - virtfs proposals - Live snapshots

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: I had assumed that this would involve: qemu -hda windows.img (qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img 1) create snap0.img internally by doing the equivalent of `qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b windows.img snap0.img' 2) bdrv_flush('ide0-disk0') 3)

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14 planning - threadlet work - virtfs proposals - Live snapshots

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 08:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: I had assumed that this would involve: qemu -hda windows.img (qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img 1) create snap0.img internally by doing the equivalent of `qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b windows.img

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 08:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:  On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: I had assumed that this would involve: qemu -hda windows.img (qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img 1) create snap0.img

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/19/2010 03:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: bdrv_aio_freeze() or any mechanism to deal with pending requests in the generic block code would be a good step for future live support of other operations like truncate. + logical disk grow, etc. -- error compiling committee.c: too many

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Ayal Baron
- Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - 0.13.X -stable handoff - 0.14

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: Please send in any agenda items you are

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Ayal Baron
- Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote: On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote: * Juan Quintela

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19

2010-10-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 10/19/2010 03:57 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: Yeah, concurrent is a little trickier. Simple solution is for a management tool to just do a stop + multiple snapshots + cont. It's equivalent to what we'd do if we don't do it aio which is probably how we'd do the first implementation. But in the