Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include better descriptions and
2010/6/16 Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Can't hurt reviewer motivation. Could it be automated? Find replies,
extract tags. If you want your acks to be picked up, you better make
sure your References header works, and your tags are formatted
correctly.
I think pwclient
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
- will slow down
