Hi Rusty,
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:19:17 am Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
One idea is similar to signalfd() or eventfd()
And thus the kvm-eventfd (irqfd/iosignalfd) interface project was born.
;)
The lguest patch
Gregory Haskins wrote:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
config LGUEST
tristate Linux hypervisor example code
- depends on X86_32 EXPERIMENTAL !X86_PAE FUTEX
+ depends on X86_32 EXPERIMENTAL !X86_PAE EVENTFD
Note to self: we probably need a similar line in KVM now.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:26:48 pm Gregory Haskins wrote:
Hi Rusty,
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:19:17 am Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
One idea is similar to signalfd() or eventfd()
And thus the kvm-eventfd (irqfd/iosignalfd) interface
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:26:48 pm Gregory Haskins wrote:
Hi Rusty,
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:19:17 am Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
One idea is similar to signalfd() or eventfd()
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:00:10 pm Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:25:01PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
+ /* lg-eventfds is RCU-protected */
+ preempt_disable();
Suggest changing to rcu_read_lock() to match the synchronize_rcu().
Ah yes, much better. As I was
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:25:57AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:00:10 pm Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:25:01PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
+ /* lg-eventfds is RCU-protected */
+ preempt_disable();
Suggest changing to rcu_read_lock() to match
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi,
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Todo:
*) Develop some kind of hypercall registration mechanism for KVM so
that
we can use that as an integration point instead of directly hooking
kvm hypercalls
What would you like to see here? I now
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:19:17 am Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
One idea is similar to signalfd() or eventfd()
And thus the kvm-eventfd (irqfd/iosignalfd) interface project was born.
;)
The lguest patch queue already has such an interface :) And I have a
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:25:01PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:19:17 am Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
One idea is similar to signalfd() or eventfd()
And thus the kvm-eventfd (irqfd/iosignalfd) interface project was born.
;)
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Avi,
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Todo:
*) Develop some kind of hypercall registration mechanism for KVM so that
we can use that as an integration point instead of directly hooking
kvm hypercalls
What would you like to see here? I now remember why I removed
This is release v2. Changes since v1:
*) Incorporated review feedback from Stephen Hemminger on vbus-enet driver
*) Added support for connecting to vbus devices from userspace
*) Added support for a virtio-vbus transport to allow virtio drivers to
work with vbus (needs testing and backend
Avi,
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Todo:
*) Develop some kind of hypercall registration mechanism for KVM so that
we can use that as an integration point instead of directly hooking
kvm hypercalls
What would you like to see here? I now remember why I removed the
original patch I had for
12 matches
Mail list logo
