Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume

2010-11-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:59 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: I'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :( Did this get applied? It seems to affect 2.6.32.x too (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602273) so can we tag it for stable as well? Thanks, Ian. Jeremy

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume

2010-10-27 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 10/26/2010 10:48 AM, Glauber Costa wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 09:59 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume

2010-10-27 Thread H. Peter Anvin
I'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :( Jeremy Fitzhardinge jer...@goop.org wrote: On 10/26/2010 10:48 AM, Glauber Costa wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 09:59 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system