Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
use qemu.git
On 03/25/10 10:39, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
For ia64 part, maybe we can keep the current qemu-kvm.git for the users. And it
is not a must to push it into Qemu upstream.
Xiantao
Does it still build work? Does someone test it at least infrequently?
Or are there users?
There
Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
use qemu.git instead of
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Chris Wright chr...@redhat.com wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
- migration (we didn't end last week)
- virtIODevice model (see Virtio cleaup thread). What is the best model
for
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
- state and roadmap for upstream merge of in-kernel device models
(looks to me like this central merge effort is stalled ATM)
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
- state and roadmap for upstream merge of in-kernel device models
(looks to
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI
patches.
- state and roadmap for upstream merge of in-kernel device
On 03/23/2010 12:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI
patches.
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 12:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI
On 03/23/2010 01:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The benefit would be that qemu-kvm.git would become a staging tree
instead of the master repository for kvm users. As an example, we
wouldn't have any bisectability problems. kvm features would need to be
written just once.
The last item
On 03/23/2010 01:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
I can't make today's call. I'd hoping there's a discussion about
libqemu and libvirt though and that
On 03/23/2010 04:52 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI
patches.
- state and roadmap for upstream merge of
On 03/23/2010 02:45 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/23/2010 04:52 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI
patches.
On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't think we can pull in:
- extboot
- ia64
- in-kernel pit[1]
- associated command line options
- device passthrough
The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually use
qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is no, what
Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
Chris Wright chr...@redhat.com wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI patches.
- migration (we didn't end last week)
I told last Tuesday that I will
16 matches
Mail list logo
