Re: PCI-Passthrough: VF ends up with no IRQ assigned on the physical machine

2012-03-27 Thread Alexander Lyakas
Hi Alex, chances are not too high, but I can try. Should I try version 0.15.1? Will it be compatible with my kernel (2.6.38-8)? Or should I also take 'kvm-kmod' or 'kvm'? Alex. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 18:34

Re: PCI-Passthrough: VF ends up with no IRQ assigned on the physical machine

2012-03-27 Thread Alex Williamson
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:01 +0200, Alexander Lyakas wrote: Hi Alex, chances are not too high, but I can try. Should I try version 0.15.1? Will it be compatible with my kernel (2.6.38-8)? Or should I also take 'kvm-kmod' or 'kvm'? Not new enough, try qemu-kvm.git. It should be compatible with

PCI-Passthrough: VF ends up with no IRQ assigned on the physical machine

2012-03-26 Thread Alexander Lyakas
Greetings everybody, I am running stock ubuntu-natty 2.6.38-8, with KVM 0.14.0 and libvirt 0.8.8. I am using Intel 82599EB dual-port 10Gb NIC with VFs spawned by each one of the PFs. Those VFs are further assigned to KVM instances with PCI-passthrough using libvirt. Each instance receives 4 VFs

Re: PCI-Passthrough: VF ends up with no IRQ assigned on the physical machine

2012-03-26 Thread Alex Williamson
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 18:34 +0200, Alexander Lyakas wrote: Greetings everybody, I am running stock ubuntu-natty 2.6.38-8, with KVM 0.14.0 and libvirt Any chance you can try upstream qemu-kvm? Interrupts, including msi-x have been given an overhaul recently. Thanks, Alex 0.8.8. I am using