I recently gathered some performance data when running Windows Server
2008 VMs, and I wanted to share it here. There are 12 Windows
Server2008 64-bit VMs (1 vcpu, 2 GB) running which handle the concurrent
execution of 6 J2EE type benchmarks. Each benchmark needs a App VM and
a Database VM. The
On 08/26/2009 05:57 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I recently gathered some performance data when running Windows Server
2008 VMs, and I wanted to share it here. There are 12 Windows
Server2008 64-bit VMs (1 vcpu, 2 GB) running which handle the concurrent
execution of 6 J2EE type benchmarks. Each
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 18:44 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:57 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I recently gathered some performance data when running Windows Server
2008 VMs, and I wanted to share it here. There are 12 Windows
Server2008 64-bit VMs (1 vcpu, 2 GB) running which handle
On 08/26/2009 07:14 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 18:44 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:57 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I recently gathered some performance data when running Windows Server
2008 VMs, and I wanted to share it here. There are 12 Windows
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:14:57 am Andrew Theurer wrote:
snip
I/O on the host was not what I would call very high: outbound network
averaged at 163 Mbit/s inbound was 8 Mbit/s, while disk read ops was
243/sec and write ops was 561/sec
What was the disk bandwidth used?
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 19:26 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/26/2009 07:14 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 18:44 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:57 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I recently gathered some performance data when running Windows Server
2008
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:27 -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:14:57 am Andrew Theurer wrote:
snip
I/O on the host was not what I would call very high: outbound network
averaged at 163 Mbit/s inbound was 8 Mbit/s, while disk read ops was
243/sec and write
On 08/26/2009 08:51 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
The stats show 'largepage = 12'. Something's wrong. There's a commit
(7736d680) that's supposed to fix largepage support for kvm-87, maybe
it's incomplete.
How strange. /proc/meminfo showed that almost all of the pages were
used:
