On Monday 17 August 2009 22:28:35 Zdenek Kaspar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess I'm not the first one who hit the problem with Microsoft's
licensing model..
Nowadays the common single or dual quad-core workstation can't be fully
used because it's limited by example: license up to 2
On 08/18/2009 06:28 AM, Zdenek Kaspar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess I'm not the first one who hit the problem with Microsoft's
licensing model..
Nowadays the common single or dual quad-core workstation can't be fully
used because it's limited by example: license up to 2 physical
processors.
Brian Jackson napsal(a):
On Monday 17 August 2009 22:28:35 Zdenek Kaspar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess I'm not the first one who hit the problem with Microsoft's
licensing model..
Nowadays the common single or dual quad-core workstation can't be fully
used because it's limited by example:
Dor Laor wrote:
On 08/18/2009 06:28 AM, Zdenek Kaspar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess I'm not the first one who hit the problem with Microsoft's
licensing model..
Nowadays the common single or dual quad-core workstation can't be fully
used because it's limited by example: license up to 2
Hello everyone,
I guess I'm not the first one who hit the problem with Microsoft's
licensing model..
Nowadays the common single or dual quad-core workstation can't be fully
used because it's limited by example: license up to 2 physical
processors. Such VM acts like 4-way or 8-way machine.
Is
