Re: default elevator=noop for virtio block devices?

2011-03-09 Thread Khoa Huynh
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote on 03/09/2011 05:12:07 AM: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 03/09/2011 11:42 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> would it make sense to make elevator=noop the default > >> for virtio block devices? Or would you recommend to >

Re: default elevator=noop for virtio block devices?

2011-03-09 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/09/2011 11:42 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> would it make sense to make elevator=noop the default >> for virtio block devices? Or would you recommend to >> set this on the kvm server instead? >> > > I think leaving the def

Re: default elevator=noop for virtio block devices?

2011-03-09 Thread Avi Kivity
On 03/09/2011 11:42 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, would it make sense to make elevator=noop the default for virtio block devices? Or would you recommend to set this on the kvm server instead? I think leaving the defaults is best. The elevator on the guest serves to schedule I/O among p

default elevator=noop for virtio block devices?

2011-03-09 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, would it make sense to make elevator=noop the default for virtio block devices? Or would you recommend to set this on the kvm server instead? Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated Harri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a messa