https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Dyweni,
On 17.01.12 23:22:29, Dyweni - KVM wrote:
I'm getting a very similar error when running oprofile on the
host...same version of oprofile...
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU 5
Modules linked in: iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi
On 01/18/2012 06:40 AM, Dyweni - KVM wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not sure who this falls to, so I've included all all parties that
I thought may be relevant.
I'm getting the following error from my guest kernel when running
oprofile within qemu-kvm:
kvm does not virtualize a PMU before Linux 3.3,
Hi All,
I'm not sure who this falls to, so I've included all all parties that I
thought may be relevant.
I'm getting the following error from my guest kernel when running
oprofile within qemu-kvm:
general protection fault: [#1]
Modules linked in:
Pid: 896, comm: oprofiled Not tainted
Hi All,
I'm getting a very similar error when running oprofile on the
host...same version of oprofile...
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU 5
Modules linked in: iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi
vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv nvidia(P)
Pid: 1498, comm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@8bytes.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
--- Comment #2 from Ricardo Wurmus ricardo.wur...@gmail.com 2011-05-27
13:19:57 ---
With 2.6.39 (from the ArchLinux testing repository) this doesn't happen
anymore. As far as I can tell[1] that kernel is unpatched downstream.
___
[1]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34282
Summary: general protection fault when starting virtual machine
with qemu
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 2.6.38
Platform: All
OS/Version
On 03/28/2011 10:14 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 28.03.2011 22:04, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Tomasz, how easily can you reproduce?
Well, this server runs 10 VMs or so, and it happens after 1-2 days of
uptime.
I reverted now to a 2.6.35.x, as it had enough downtime with 2.6.38
already ;)
On 20.04.2011 11:28, Thomas Treutner wrote:
On 03/28/2011 10:14 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 28.03.2011 22:04, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Tomasz, how easily can you reproduce?
Well, this server runs 10 VMs or so, and it happens after 1-2 days of
uptime.
I reverted now to a 2.6.35.x, as it
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:19:51AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/28/2011 08:24 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 27.03.2011 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
(...)
Okay, the fork came from the ,script=.
The issue with %rsi looks like a use-after-free, however
On 27.03.2011 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
(...)
Okay, the fork came from the ,script=.
The issue with %rsi looks like a use-after-free, however
kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start appears to be properly srcu
protected.
FYI, I saw this one as well:
http://www.virtall.com/files/temp/kvm.txt
On 03/28/2011 08:24 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 27.03.2011 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
(...)
Okay, the fork came from the ,script=.
The issue with %rsi looks like a use-after-free, however
kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start appears to be properly srcu
protected.
FYI, I saw this one
Hello everyone,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:19:51AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/28/2011 08:24 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 27.03.2011 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
(...)
Okay, the fork came from the ,script=.
The issue with %rsi looks like a use-after-free, however
On 03/28/2011 07:54 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
BTW, is it genuine that a protection fault is generated instead of a page
fault while dereferencing address 0x8805d6b087f8? I would normally
except a page fault from a memory dereference that doesn't alter
processor state/segments.
Yes. Bits
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:02:47PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/28/2011 07:54 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
BTW, is it genuine that a protection fault is generated instead of a page
fault while dereferencing address 0x8805d6b087f8? I would normally
except a page fault from a memory
On 28.03.2011 22:04, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Tomasz, how easily can you reproduce?
Well, this server runs 10 VMs or so, and it happens after 1-2 days of
uptime.
I reverted now to a 2.6.35.x, as it had enough downtime with 2.6.38
already ;) so I'd rather not experiment anymore for some
On 03/26/2011 12:42 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 26.03.2011 10:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got this on a 2.6.38.1 system which (I think) had some problem
accessing guest image on a btrfs filesystem.
general protection fault: [#1
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got this on a 2.6.38.1 system which (I think) had some problem accessing
guest image on a btrfs filesystem.
general protection fault: [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum
CPU 0
Modules linked in: ipt_MASQUERADE vhost_net
On 26.03.2011 10:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 11:32 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got this on a 2.6.38.1 system which (I think) had some problem
accessing guest image on a btrfs filesystem.
general protection fault: [#1] SMP
(...)
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
I got this on a 2.6.38.1 system which (I think) had some problem accessing
guest image on a btrfs filesystem.
general protection fault: [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum
CPU 0
Modules linked in: ipt_MASQUERADE vhost_net kvm_intel kvm iptable_filter
xt_tcpudp
Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
after booting 2.6.36 on one of my testing machines, modprobe kvm-intel
produces:
[ 1349.991299] general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1349.997199] last sysfs file: /sys/module/drbd/parameters/cn_idx
[ 1350.003201] CPU 2
[ 1350.005081] Modules linked in: kvm
On 11/08/2010 09:41 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
after booting 2.6.36 on one of my testing machines, modprobe kvm-intel
produces:
[ 1349.991299] general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1349.997199] last sysfs file: /sys/module/drbd/parameters/cn_idx
[ 1350.003201] CPU 2
[ 1350.005081
Hi,
after booting 2.6.36 on one of my testing machines, modprobe kvm-intel
produces:
[ 1349.991299] general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1349.997199] last sysfs file: /sys/module/drbd/parameters/cn_idx
[ 1350.003201] CPU 2
[ 1350.005081] Modules linked in: kvm(+) ocfs2
24 matches
Mail list logo
