On 27.03.2012 19:06, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 06:16:11 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:23:33AM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26,
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23,
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200,
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26:29AM +0200,
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:56:05 AM
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 11:23,
On 27.03.2012 17:37, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:29 AM
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:00,
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:39:10 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:37, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:44:51 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 13:43, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:49:58 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 12:40,
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:20:23PM +0200,
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:26,
On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:28:04PM +0200,
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 06:16:11 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 18:12, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 05:58:01 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 17:44, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 04:06:13 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 27.03.2012 14:29,
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday,
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22,
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 10:38, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at
On Monday, March 26, 2012 08:54:50 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 26.03.2012 20:36, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:52:49 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Monday, March 26, 2012 07:00:32 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
On
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to addfeature policy='disable' name='hypervisor'/ to cpu
definition in XML and check command line.
On 22.03.2012 08:53, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to addfeature policy='disable' name='hypervisor'/ to
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose
performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM
timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using -hypervisor for
production!
hello,
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:57:08AM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
@avi, gleb: another option would be to revisit the old in-kernel
pm-timer implementation
and check if its feasible to use this as an alternative. it would also
help non hyper-v aware
systems (i
Le Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
please keep in mind, that setting -hypervisor, disabling hpet and only
one vcpu
makes windows use tsc as clocksource. you have to make sure, that your vm
is not switching between physical sockets on your system and that you
On 22.03.2012 09:31, David Cure wrote:
Le Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait :
please keep in mind, that setting -hypervisor, disabling hpet and only
one vcpu
makes windows use tsc as clocksource. you have to make sure, that your vm
is not switching between physical
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to addfeature policy='disable'
On 22.03.2012 09:33, David Cure wrote:
Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose
performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM
timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:52:42 AM Peter Lieven wrote:
On 22.03.2012 09:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to add feature policy='disable' name='hypervisor'/ to cpu
definition in XML and check command line.
ok I try this but I can't use cpu model to map the host cpu
(my libvirt is 0.9.8) so I use
On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to addfeature policy='disable' name='hypervisor'/ to cpu
definition in XML and check command line.
ok I try this but I can't usecpu model to map the
hello,
Le Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you run the same test on Linux guest and on Windows vm with 1 cpu?
I see a lot of IPIs between vcpus.
I run the same slowly fonction (to remember the guest is
Windows2008R2 64bits). The report
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:32:20AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you run the same test on Linux guest and on Windows vm with 1 cpu?
I see a lot of IPIs between vcpus.
I run the same slowly
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:45:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
This is without -no-hpet :) Also I hope you are not measuring time while
ha yes, sorry for the mistake.
tracing since it supposed to be slower. Can you please try to run with
-cpu host,-hypervisor and -no-hpet
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:18:39PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:45:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
This is without -no-hpet :) Also I hope you are not measuring time while
ha yes, sorry for the mistake.
tracing since it supposed to be slower. Can
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
hello,
sorry for the delay,
Le Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Ah, I guess the reason is that it records events only of IO thread. You
need to trace all vcpu threads too.
hello,
sorry for the delay,
Le Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Ah, I guess the reason is that it records events only of IO thread. You
need to trace all vcpu threads too. Not sure trace-cmd allows more then
one -P option though.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:33:56PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
Le Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
http://www.roullier.net/report-no-hpet.txt.gz
How have you acquired this trace? It does not trace all kvm events only
those that have set_irq in them.
Le Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
http://www.roullier.net/report-no-hpet.txt.gz
How have you acquired this trace? It does not trace all kvm events only
those that have set_irq in them.
I run : trace-cmd record -b 2 -e kvm -P process_pid
To complete and because I see another thread on performance
trouble with w2008R2
Le Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:33:56PM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
Nothing particularly strange here. ~1745 IRQs are injected into the
guest each second. RTC clock is configured to 1kH and other devices
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 03:01:07PM +0100, David Cure wrote:
Le Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
-P pid
ok. I take a trace
Le Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:59:39AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
Le Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
-P pid
--
Gleb.
Le Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:07:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Can you do the trace again with -no-hpet on the command line?
Is there a way to only trace events on specific VM ?
-P pid
ok. I take a trace of the VM with 1 user : start trace just
before to launch slowly
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:48:56AM -0500, Vadim Rozenfeld ecrivait :
+1
Try Microsoft Windows Performance Toolkit from Windows SDK
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=3138
It's really good.
I run xperf -on DiagEasy, and as I'm not an windows-er the
hello,
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to add -no-hpet to qemu command line and see if it helps.
I add this line in my xml definition for libvirt :
timer name='hpet' present='no'/ in the clock block. And I see
the -no-hpet
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:55:53AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
Try to add -no-hpet to qemu command line and see if it helps.
I add this line in my xml definition for libvirt :
timer
Le Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
It's reading the HPET like crazy. There are also tons of interrupts.
Please use the windows performance tools to see which devices trigger
these interrupts.
The HPET issue will be fixed by the hyper-V enlightenments, but
On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
Please post a trace as documented in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
I made the trace : started just before the slow function launch
and stoped
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:32:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
hello,
Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
Please post a trace as documented in
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
I made the
- Original Message -
From: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
To: David Cure k...@cure.nom.fr
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:32:16 PM
Subject: Re: performance trouble
On 02/10/2012 12:09 PM, David Cure wrote:
hello
hello,
Le Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
Please post a trace as documented in http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing.
I made the trace : started just before the slow function launch
and stoped just after. I start only one VM with 2
Hello,
Le Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:41:48AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
For kvm_stats, I mean it's better to have only one VM with one
user for the test so I send this evening or tomorrow morning.
I attach snapshot of the kvm_stat : the first one just before to
Hello,
Le Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:21:25PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
How many vcpus are there in total (over all guests)?
For test we run only 2 VM (RDS/TSE) with 2vcpus for each
That's really strange. No network traffic/cpu/block I/O?
What do 'vmstat 1' and
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
Start with top and vmstat to see if the cpu or I/O are the bottleneck
with top at the kvm layer, the VM take 50% of CPU (the physical
box have 16 real cores-not HT- : AMD Opteron 6134).
one result of vmstat :
What's up with the cc list?
On 01/31/2012 07:15 PM, David Cure wrote:
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Avi Kivity ecrivait :
Start with top and vmstat to see if the cpu or I/O are the bottleneck
with top at the kvm layer, the VM take 50% of CPU (the physical
box have 16
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
I use several kvm box, and no problem at all except for 1
application that have bad response time.
The VM runs Windows 2008R2 and the application is an
client-server app develop with progress software and talk to
On Monday, January 30, 2012 09:36:55 AM David Cure wrote:
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
I use several kvm box, and no problem at all except for 1
application that have bad response time.
The VM runs Windows 2008R2 and the application is an
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Brian Jackson ecrivait :
Without more info or some way to reproduce the problem, it would be pointless
for one of the devs to spend much time on it.
yes for sure.
But I mean there is some way to trace at the KVM level what happens
On 01/30/2012 06:51 PM, David Cure wrote:
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Brian Jackson ecrivait :
Without more info or some way to reproduce the problem, it would be
pointless
for one of the devs to spend much time on it.
yes for sure.
But I mean there is
Hello,
I use several kvm box, and no problem at all except for 1
application that have bad response time.
The VM runs Windows 2008R2 and the application is an
client-server app develop with progress software and talk to an Oracle
databasei (on another server) and
Le Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:28:37AM +0100, David Cure ecrivait :
I attach the libvirt xml of my vm.
I forget to attach ;)
David.
rds.xml
Description: XML document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
73 matches
Mail list logo