Now I execute:
/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -no-acpi -hda
/root/winXP/windows_kvm.disk -boot c -m 512
On the terminal where I execute the command the following appears:
unhandled vm exit: 0x8022
rax 0800 rbx ffdff120 rcx c080 rdx
rsi
Hello!
v7 with 2.6.19.1 works OK.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK
> I restored the original vmx.c file and I applyed the second patch but
> wueh I boot winxp no lines are addes in /var/log/messages and dmesg
> produces the following :
>
> kvm: msrs: 6
>
>
How does it crash now?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for t
OK
I restored the original vmx.c file and I applyed the second patch but
wueh I boot winxp no lines are addes in /var/log/messages and dmesg
produces the following :
kvm: msrs: 6
- Messaggio da [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Data: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:20:41 +0200
Da: Avi Kivity <[EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I did not understand ... sorry.
> Let me to explain what I am doing...
>
> modprobe -r kvm-intel
> cd kvm-7
> patch kernel/vmx.c your_first_patch_file
> pacth kernel/vmx.c your_second_patch_file
> make
> make install
> modprobe -r kvm-intel
>
> Then I lauch the winxp bo
I did not understand ... sorry.
Let me to explain what I am doing...
modprobe -r kvm-intel
cd kvm-7
patch kernel/vmx.c your_first_patch_file
pacth kernel/vmx.c your_second_patch_file
make
make install
modprobe -r kvm-intel
Then I lauch the winxp boot.
Is it correct ?
- Messaggio da [EMAIL
>
> Applayed your patch and launched the windows xp boot.
> Dmesg is attacched here.
>
>
It's no good, I didn't tell you to rewind the first patch and leave only
the later one.
It should print the msrs only on the erroneous vmexit and provide the
host & guest msrs.
>
> - Messaggio da [EMA
Applayed your patch and launched the windows xp boot.
Dmesg is attacched here.
- Messaggio da [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Data: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:41:23 -0800
Da: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rispondi-A: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto: Re: [kvm-devel] Windows XP internal Power
>
>
> I compiled check_msr.
> I did not find a msr module to load but I found /dev/cpu/0/msr.
> Any case runnig check_msr I got the following:
> c080: may read and write
> c081: may read and write
> c082: may read and write
> c083: may read and write
Looks like the msr does exist
I compiled check_msr.
I did not find a msr module to load but I found /dev/cpu/0/msr.
Any case runnig check_msr I got the following:
c080: may read and write
c081: may read and write
c082: may read and write
c083: may read and write
c084: may read and write
c102: may read a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I applyed the patch.
Attacched here there is the dmesg output.
Please run the attached program and report output.
Before you run it, run 'modprobe msr' and check you have a /dev/cpu/0/msr.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
#define _FILE_O
I applyed the patch.
Attacched here there is the dmesg output.
Thanks
- Messaggio da [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Data: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:42:49 -0800
Da: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rispondi-A: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto: RE: [kvm-devel] Windows XP internal Power error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My cpu model is :
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.60GHz
>
I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz on one of my boxes. Strange.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
My cpu model is :
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.60GHz
- Messaggio da [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Data: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:26:48 +0200
Da: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rispondi-A: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto: Re: [kvm-devel] Windows XP internal Power error
A: [EMAIL
Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael Riepe wrote:
Oh well...
I was wondering which stupid piece of sh^H^Hcode generated so many wrong
rdmsr instructions without looking at the CPU feature flags. So I
grepped through the linux kernel and glibc sources as well as some other
likely suspects and found - nothi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Good moorning, I changed the -boot option in 'c' but when my Windows
Xp
> boot
> > to complete the installation I got the following errors:
> >
> > unhandled vm exit: 0x8022
> > rax 0800 rbx ffdff120 rcx c080 rdx
> > 000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good moorning, I changed the -boot option in 'c' but when my Windows Xp boot
> to complete the installation I got the following errors:
>
> unhandled vm exit: 0x8022
> rax 0800 rbx ffdff120 rcx c080 rdx
>
> rsi 00
Michael Riepe wrote:
> Oh well...
>
> I was wondering which stupid piece of sh^H^Hcode generated so many wrong
> rdmsr instructions without looking at the CPU feature flags. So I
> grepped through the linux kernel and glibc sources as well as some other
> likely suspects and found - nothing.
>
> Gu
18 matches
Mail list logo
