Hi Avi,
> what guest? what host?
Guest and host == ubuntu 6.10
host = Intel VT
It fails on Qemu start up, which shows a black screen and terminate
with the exception 13 (0) error. I read somewhere that this is due to
the Intel VT inability to handle real mode, is this the case?
Thanks
Both svn and wiki servers are up and running again.
Rami
From: Rami Tamir
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: svn and wiki maintenance
We are finalizing our network upgrade, svn and wiki servers will be
What has made the KVM-13 stop working with Linux 2.6.20 kvm and kvm-intel?
iain
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
-
We are finalizing our network upgrade, svn and wiki servers will be
offline for the next few hours.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Rami
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff don
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:46:25PM +, Omar Khan wrote:
> hi,
>
>"make install" does not install the modules in the right directory
> (actually
> it is not making the 'extra' directory). I changed
>
>KERNELDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
> to
>KERNELDIR := /lib
hi,
"make install" does not install the modules in the right directory (actually
it is not making the 'extra' directory). I changed
KERNELDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
to
KERNELDIR := /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
in the kernel/Makefile and it is working now
Manish Regmi wrote:
> When kvm initializes, it calls hardware_setup which calls
> alloc_kvm_area which allocates vmcs for each online processor and
> stores the pointer in percpu basis.
>
VT requires a per-cpu page to store the host state in when VMLAUNCH is
executed. This is the host save ar
When kvm initializes, it calls hardware_setup which calls
alloc_kvm_area which allocates vmcs for each online processor and
stores the pointer in percpu basis.
Later when vmx_create_vcpu is called, the vmcs area is allocated
(again) and this time for the cpu the code is currently executing on.
pos
On 2/8/07, Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:21:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Cyril Plisko wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Can this be sysenter support? i.e. is sysenter supported on opteron but
> > >>not on athlon x2?
> > >
> > >
> > >AFAIK, on both Opteron an Athlon X2
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:21:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
> >>
> >>Can this be sysenter support? i.e. is sysenter supported on opteron but
> >>not on athlon x2?
> >
> >
> >AFAIK, on both Opteron an Athlon X2 Solaris uses syscall, rather than
> >sysenter.
> >The catch here i
On 2/8/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
> >>
> >> Can this be sysenter support? i.e. is sysenter supported on opteron but
> >> not on athlon x2?
> >
> >
> > AFAIK, on both Opteron an Athlon X2 Solaris uses syscall, rather than
> > sysenter.
> > The catch here is that
Cyril Plisko wrote:
>>
>> Can this be sysenter support? i.e. is sysenter supported on opteron but
>> not on athlon x2?
>
>
> AFAIK, on both Opteron an Athlon X2 Solaris uses syscall, rather than
> sysenter.
> The catch here is that it starts with the least optimized libc at
> boot, and at some
> p
Hi Leonard,
Can you try the attached patch and tell me what's going on?
Sorry for the delay response, I was a little busy.
The patch zero's the svm interrupt vector after vmexit, right after we
checked for pending irq's that were not injected.
Although the IRQ_MASK is zerod I suspect it might get
On 2/8/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:04:54PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Waba wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, Feb
Lucky 13.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technol
I decided to forgo a sync release with 2.6.20 as kvm-12 was already
close enough.
Changes from kvm-12:
- add dirty page tracking in some corner cases for live migration
- fix lockups on nx-challenged hosts
- host suspend/resume
- nobody's testing this, so it's probably broken
- host cpu hotplu
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:04:54PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>
Waba wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:42:01AM +0200, Avi Kivity w
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:04:54PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >>Waba wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:42:01AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>
> ok. please keep the patch applied, an
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Waba wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:42:01AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>
ok. please keep the patch applied, and an addition:
- change '#undef AUDIT' to '#define AUD
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Waba wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:42:01AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> ok. please keep the patch applied, and an addition:
> >>
> >> - change '#undef AUDIT' to '#define AUDIT' in mmu.c
> >> - in the same file, change 's
Waba wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:42:01AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> ok. please keep the patch applied, and an addition:
>>
>> - change '#undef AUDIT' to '#define AUDIT' in mmu.c
>> - in the same file, change 'static int dbg = 1;' to 'static int dbg = 0;'
>> - 'echo 9 > /proc/sysrq-tr
21 matches
Mail list logo
