Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 23:39 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>>
>>> Greg:
>>> I think you need to do the whole patch for this including kernel
>>> side. Will u ?
>>>
>> Ya, I can do that. But I probably wont be able to look at it until
>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> Dave, can you diff the guest dmesg with kvm-27 and kvm-28 userspace?
>>> Maybe that will tell us something.
>>>
>>
>> Here's kvm-27 and kvm-27+55a3212bc2...:
>>
>>
>> diff -ru kvm-fast-dmesg.txt kvm-slow-dmesg.txt
>> Linux version 2.6.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gc
[added back cc]
Paul Turner wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Paul Turner wrote:
>> > From: Paul Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > - vcpus now allocated on demand
>> > - vmx/svm fields separated into arch specific structures on vcpus
>> > - vmx/svm fields now only al
Linus, please do your usual thing from the repository and branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git for-linus
This contains kvm updates for the 2.6.23 merge window, including
- performance improvements
- suspend/resume fixes
- guest smp
- random fixes and cleanups
I noticed kvm 29 added a command into make install
to move the distro installed kvm.ko modules out of
the way.
But for me, I had already removed the drivers/kvm
directory, so make install was getting a file does
not exist error. So I added a test for the directory.
John
--- kvm-29/kernel/Makef
save $6590 our price - $129.95 Autodesk Autocad 2008
http://zebaratt.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just d
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> I tested FC6 i386 about found no difference with or without the patch.
>>
>
> I've git bisected down the the same patch that you pasted above. I've
> also tried just applying that single patch to kvm-27 and repr
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:39 +0200, Luca wrote:
> Dave, can you confirm that backing out my patch fixes your speed
> issue?
Sure, I'll check current git with and without your patch.
I've reproduced that _applying_ it to kvm-27 creates the slowdown, but
I'll double-check that backing it out restor
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I tested FC6 i386 about found no difference with or without the patch.
I've git bisected down the the same patch that you pasted above. I've
also tried just applying that single patch to kvm-27 and reproduced the
slow behavior.
> Dave, can y
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:39 +0200, Luca wrote:
> Still, I fail to see why enabling the ports should reduce the speed.
> Dave, can you confirm that backing out my patch fixes your speed issue?
BTW: I said what I said because I thought people had already bisected
the problem down to your patch. If
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:39 +0200, Luca wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:46 +0200, Luca wrote:
> > > On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to clarify: you are suggesting that the "old" IDE driver used to
> >
On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:46 +0200, Luca wrote:
> > On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify: you are suggesting that the "old" IDE driver used to
> > see that the controller was disabled and reprogrammed it
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:46 +0200, Luca wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify: you are suggesting that the "old" IDE driver used to
> see that the controller was disabled and reprogrammed it by itself
> (fast mode); now it sees it's enabled and leaves wh
On 7/13/07, Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
> > I tested FC6 i386 about found no difference with or without the patch.
> >
> > Dave, can you diff the guest dmesg with kvm-27 and kvm-28 userspace?
> > Maybe that will tell us somet
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 16:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I tested FC6 i386 about found no difference with or without the patch.
>
> Dave, can you diff the guest dmesg with kvm-27 and kvm-28 userspace?
> Maybe that will tell us something.
>
I can say this: It would seem that the IDE enable bits
Luca wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 08:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can you confirm it by backing out that one patch?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Do you know the git commit id by chance?
>> >
>> > -- Dave
>> >
>> >
>> commit
On 7/13/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 08:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> Can you confirm it by backing out that one patch?
> >>
> >
> > Do you know the git commit id by chance?
> >
> > -- Dave
> >
> >
> commit 55a3212bc2f5ecddcd4c5cdf2
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Avi:
> Per our discussion, we will only support all user level irqchip
> or all kernel level irqchip.
> Here is the patch against lapic2 that passed RHEL5U test. Please give
> comments.
>
>
> thx,eddie
>
>
General comments:
- please split into a hlt patch, lapic p
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 08:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Can you confirm it by backing out that one patch?
>>
>
> Do you know the git commit id by chance?
>
> -- Dave
>
>
commit 55a3212bc2f5ecddcd4c5cdf2bfb37ad71e45ff2
Author: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dat
Avi:
Per our discussion, we will only support all user level irqchip
or all kernel level irqchip.
Here is the patch against lapic2 that passed RHEL5U test. Please give
comments.
thx,eddie
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/Makefile b/drivers/kvm/Makefile
index 952dff3..b29651b 100644
--- a/d
Jun Koi wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> > This looks like a typo. I think the intention of the if is to
>> normalize
>> > i[3456]86 to i386 since that's the target name for QEMU.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
Paul Turner wrote:
> From: Paul Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - vcpus now allocated on demand
> - vmx/svm fields separated into arch specific structures on vcpus
> - vmx/svm fields now only allocated on corresponding architectures
>
> - Paul
>
> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
