[kvm-devel] emulating gigabit ethernet

2007-10-04 Thread Wes
Awesome. I look forward to testing them :) Wes On 10/5/07, Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wes wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > Are there any plans on emulating gigabit under qemu/kvm? > yes, there are plans to emulate e1000, and there are para virtualzed > drivers that should give good

Re: [kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-04 Thread Izik Eidus
Kay Hayen wrote: > > > So in FAQ and Wiki I didn't find how to make the guest use host time. Is that > possible at all? For VMWare it is said that clock=pit would help, but that > seemed to be no change. > ok, as for now what you can do is run it with: "-tdf -no-kvm-irqchip -no-acpi" thanks.

Re: [kvm-devel] emulating gigabit ethernet

2007-10-04 Thread Izik Eidus
Wes wrote: > Hello List, > > Are there any plans on emulating gigabit under qemu/kvm? yes, there are plans to emulate e1000, and there are para virtualzed drivers that should give good performance ( i dont know where the PV drivers will be released ) but this issue is known and work is made to s

[kvm-devel] emulating gigabit ethernet

2007-10-04 Thread Wes
Hello List, Are there any plans on emulating gigabit under qemu/kvm? I ask because at the moment networking in guests on an ibm x3650 host is embarrassingly slow. Using model=rtl8139 results in max of 12% of bandwidth utilisation @ 100mbit (which in practice equates to 10mbit performance), and u

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Gregory Haskins
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 21:49 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > Gregory Haskins wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > > > >> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would > >> be better to witch gcc-4.x? > > > > Sure. Are you volunteering? ;)

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Farkas Levente
Gregory Haskins wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > >> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would >> be better to witch gcc-4.x? > > Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers, > KVM developers, and the comm

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Gregory Haskins
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would > be better to witch gcc-4.x? Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers, KVM developers, and the community using either would be most ap

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Farkas Levente
Gregory Haskins wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: >> hi, >> what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x? >> wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too? > > Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code. It takes a

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Gregory Haskins
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x? > wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too? Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code. It takes advantage of compiler traits that

Re: [kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x? wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too? SourceForge.net wrote: > Bugs item #1807620, was opened at 2007-10-04 18:25 > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter > Yo

[kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807620 ] KVM's --disable-gcc-check doesn't work

2007-10-04 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1807620, was opened at 2007-10-04 18:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1807620&group_id=180599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy

[kvm-devel] Guest Time Question

2007-10-04 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello, I am currently evaluating kvm for using it for an application where correct time is absolutely critical. We therefore normally use NTP on these machines to synchronize them with GPS time. For a virtual machine in my eyes that means, the host should be synchronized and the guests just us

[kvm-devel] [ kvm-Bugs-1807560 ] Font corruption (AMD specific)

2007-10-04 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1807560, was opened at 2007-10-04 14:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1807560&group_id=180599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] Re: CodingStyle cleanup (Resubmit - fixed DSO)

2007-10-04 Thread Mike Day
CodingStyle cleanup for kvm.h Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kvm.h | 32 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h index 8e58f3b..f0dfb1f 100644 --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h +++ b/driver

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] CodingStyle cleanup

2007-10-04 Thread Mike Day
Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kvm_main.c | 48 +--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c index 2c3986f..1d44e6d 100644 --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] CodingStyle cleanup

2007-10-04 Thread Mike Day
CodingStyle cleanup for kvm.h Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kvm.h | 32 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h index 8e58f3b..f0dfb1f 100644 --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h +++ b/drivers

[kvm-devel] Türk Patent Enstitüsü ve Moğ olistan Fikri Mülkiyet Ofisi Dayanışması

2007-10-04 Thread NETMARK PATENT
Türk Patent Enstitüsü ve Moğolistan Fikri Mülkiyet Ofisi Dayanışması Türk Patent Enstitüsü (TPE) ve Moğolistan Fikri Mülkiyet Ofisi (IPOM) arasındaki teknik işbirliği görüşmeleri 21-23 Ağustos 2007 tarihlerinde Moğolistan'ın Ulan Batur şehrinde gerçekleştirildi. IPOM p