[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:29 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Patch looks good, but I'm missing a signed-off-by: line.
>>
>> Eddie, can you also take a look?
>
> I split the patch in two. The first one fixes the host OS kernel
> divide by zero problem. The second cleans up
Fully Licensed Medical Doctors in the US
788,103 in total 17,680 emails
Lots of Medical Doctors in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology,
Dermatology, Neurology, General Practice etc..
Sort by over a dozen different fields
Specially reduced price: $322
*** Recieve the data
>From c5c9ec8d090d553b4d5d00e7ba7fc2daddfb3d00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:31:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix compile error on latest commit
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c |1 +
1 files
I meet compile error when build kvm against latest kvm commits.
/workspace/ia32e/nightly/kvm-master-2.6.22-rc4-20071018020114360/kvm-use
rspace/BUILD/kernel/ioapic.o
CC [M]
/workspace/ia32e/nightly/kvm-master-2.6.22-rc4-20071018020114360/kvm-use
rspace/BUILD/kernel/preempt.o
/workspace/ia32e/nig
>>> previous irq injection, next injection will be refused with IRQ
>>> window enabled. This is because current implementation will inject
>>> exception earlier than irq injection and vmx_intr_assist doesn;t
>>> know if previous injected event is external irq (and thus
>>> overwrite) or exception.
Izik Eidus wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>> I've made kvm_create() optionally skip the memory setup, so I can
>>> create
>>> my own later on. That doesn't work though because creating the vcpu
>>> fails then.
>>>
>>
>> Ugh, vmx grabs last 4 pages from slot 0 (lo
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> I've made kvm_create() optionally skip the memory setup, so I can create
>> my own later on. That doesn't work though because creating the vcpu
>> fails then.
>>
>
> Ugh, vmx grabs last 4 pages from slot 0 (looks like for real mode
> emulati
Qemu is interpreting --cross-prefix & cpu as one argument. This of
course yeilds an error. This fixes the error.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/configure b/configure
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ fi
${disable_gcc_check:+"--disable-gcc-chec
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:23:41PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> The 0F 01 instruction is then correctly emulated, but another of this
> > Oops s/0F 01/invlpg/
> >> group is probably not, as the patch clearly fix the problem on AMD.
> >
>
> I confirm the problem. SVM does not virtualize smsw
> Applied, thanks. We'll have to manage the interrupt window during
> emulation like we do while running native, so there's more work
> here.
I totally agree. So far I don't see any issue ignoring that aspect, so I
think no point in holding emulation patch at my end. More can be added
to the same
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:29 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Patch looks good, but I'm missing a signed-off-by: line.
>
> Eddie, can you also take a look?
I split the patch in two. The first one fixes the host OS kernel
divide by zero problem. The second cleans up apic_get_tmcct() a bit.
Both now incl
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> This series adds options to kvm's configure that match the ones used by qemu
> to conditionally enable or disable options that alter its runtime dependencies
> and functionality, like for example, support for alsa or TLS encrypted vnc
> sessions.
>
>
Applied
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>> But invlpg is defined as having reg == 7! The manual says:
>>>
>>> 0F 01/7 INVLPG m
>>>
>>> where "/7" is the notation for "reg in the mod reg r/m byte:
>>>
>>> " /digit — A digit between 0 and 7 indicates that the ModR
Add a --disable-vnc-tls option so that support for TLS authentication
for the VNC server can be conditionally disabled.
This makes the dependency to gnutls added by the new qemu conditional and
explicit.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
configure |6 ++
1
Add an --enable-alsa option to conditionally add support for alsa so that
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa is supported.
This makes the dependency to alsa conditional and explicit.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
configure |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1
This series adds options to kvm's configure that match the ones used by qemu
to conditionally enable or disable options that alter its runtime dependencies
and functionality, like for example, support for alsa or TLS encrypted vnc
sessions.
Carlo
--
Jerone Young wrote:
> This patch takes feedback from Anthony Liguouri.
> - remove --cc option added in v4 of patch (keep old behavior)
> - do not specify cc= everytime on the qemu configuration line, this
> allows qemu to autodetect gcc 3.x
>
> This simplifies the patch more. While preserving behav
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>
>> But invlpg is defined as having reg == 7! The manual says:
>>
>> 0F 01/7 INVLPG m
>>
>> where "/7" is the notation for "reg in the mod reg r/m byte:
>>
>> " /digit — A digit between 0 and 7 indicates that the ModR/M byte of the
>> instruction us
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>
>> But invlpg is defined as having reg == 7! The manual says:
>>
>> 0F 01/7 INVLPG m
>>
>> where "/7" is the notation for "reg in the mod reg r/m byte:
>>
>> " /digit — A digit between 0 and 7 indicates that the ModR/M byte of the
>> instruction us
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>
>> But invlpg is defined as having reg == 7! The manual says:
>>
>> 0F 01/7 INVLPG m
>>
>> where "/7" is the notation for "reg in the mod reg r/m byte:
>>
>> " /digit — A digit between 0 and 7 indicates that the ModR/M byte of the
>> instruction us
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>
>> But invlpg is defined as having reg == 7! The manual says:
>>
>> 0F 01/7 INVLPG m
>>
>> where "/7" is the notation for "reg in the mod reg r/m byte:
>>
>> " /digit — A digit between 0 and 7 indicates that the ModR/M byte of the
>> instruction us
Avi Kivity a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c b/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
index e974ace..06e183b 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
@@ -825,12 +825,12 @@ modrm_done:
c->src.bytes = 4;
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Wrong mailing list.
> Resend :-(
>
>
(and here's a copy of my reply if someone is interested)
> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
>> Avi:
>> This patch may be questionable at least for current VMX.
>> If VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD is already set valid by
>> previous irq inje
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>
>> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>>
>>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>
>> I have marked the invlpg i
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c b/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
>>> index e974ace..06e183b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c
>>> @@ -825,12 +825,12 @@ modrm_done:
>>> c->src.bytes = 4;
>>> goto srcmem_
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Avi Kivity a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have marked the invlpg instruction the same way as it is done in
> kvm-37 to know what happens. I get eith
Avi Kivity a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>
I have marked the invlpg instruction the same way as it is done in
kvm-37 to know what happens. I get either modrm_reg = 4 or = 6 when the
>
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>
>>> I have marked the invlpg instruction the same way as it is done in
>>> kvm-37 to know what happens. I get either modrm_reg = 4 or = 6 when the
>>> invlpg instruction is exec
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:36:03AM -0500, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:20:37PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> > >
> > >>It seems like rather
> > >>a bad idea to suddenly switch the configure script defaults in the way
> > >>you
Dear miss/Sir
I am writting this letter with due respect and heartful of tears since we have
not known or meet ourselves previously I am asking for your assistance after I
have gone through a webpage that speaks good of you. I want to find out if it's
possible for you to deal with individua
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >I have marked the invlpg instruction the same way as it is done in
> >kvm-37 to know what happens. I get either modrm_reg = 4 or = 6 when the
> >invlpg instruction is executed, but never = 7.
> >
> >
>
> T
Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> Attached is the patch implementing these eflags manipulating
> instructions:
> cmc, clc, cli, sti
>
> opcodes: 0xf5, 0xf8, 0xfa, 0xfb
>
Applied, thanks. We'll have to manage the interrupt window during
emulation like we do while running nativ
Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:12 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>> Why do you think it is better? I would have thought that vm86 is much
>> faster.
>>
>>
> I am seeing execution going to strange places in vm86 mode. That issue
> is not coming in the emulation.
>
>
That
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> I've made kvm_create() optionally skip the memory setup, so I can create
> my own later on. That doesn't work though because creating the vcpu
> fails then.
Ugh, vmx grabs last 4 pages from slot 0 (looks like for real mode
emulation). Thus memory must exist before creating
Wrong mailing list.
Resend :-(
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Avi:
> This patch may be questionable at least for current VMX.
> If VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD is already set valid by
> previous irq injection, next injection will be refused with IRQ window
> enabled. This is because current implemen
Hi,
with the new kernel 2.6.23.1 OpenBSD 4.1 works.
Becuase you wrote I should use the nwe modules instead - I didn't got kernel
modules from kvm-46 taf file. Do I've to download another archive for the
kernel modules?
regards,
Oliver
---
Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Not quit understand the following code. If we just set
> a vcpu request bits w/o real irq injection, we can't resume
> to guest? Othrewise, the guest is in interruptable state and can
> see irq pending, but it doesn't get the interrupt.
>
> Something missing?
> thx,eddie
>
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
