pravin wrote:
Hi
I tried to build kvm-48 on open suse 10.3 but configure is
giving me error. actually no virtual graphics card is getting selected
as SDL is giving error.
-
Install prefix/usr/local
BIOS directory/usr/local/share/qemu
binary directory
Didn't see it on kvm tree.
The latest commit is 20 hours ago.
I think Anthony has posted a patch to correct this, the name is [kvm-devel]
[PATCH] Fix external module build.
Laurent
Zhao, Yunfeng a écrit :
I fails to build the latest tip.
A .h file is missing.
error: asm/kvm_para.h: No such
Anthony Liguori wrote:
The recent paravirt refactoring broke external modules. This patch fixes
that.
Thanks, applied.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
Didn't see it on kvm tree.
The latest commit is 20 hours ago.
It's now in.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
Jan Kiszka wrote:
As vmx_create_vcpu already makes use of start/end_special_insn, we need
to initialise the emulated preempt_notifier earlier. Let's move it to
kvm_vcpu_init. This should fix an oops I've seen here at least once
during kvm startup - so far the problem did not show up again.
Laurent Vivier wrote:
Before kernel 2.6.24, smp_call_function_mask() is not defined for architecture
x86_64 and not for architecture i386.
This patch defines it in external-module-compat.h to emulate it for older
kernel, it uses codes from arch/x86/kernel/smp_64.c modified to call
* Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071022 09:42]:
I'm not sure that's useful -- very little changed after 2.6.23-rc1 (10
patches).
There were 92 kvm patches in 2.6.23, so a bisect should take about a
week worst case.
I'll get started tonight.
-Bart
--
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi,
[somehow your mails do not get through to my private account, so I'm
switching]
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Clarification: I can't precisely tell what code is executed in VM mode,
as I don't have qemu or that guest instrumented. I just see the
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 16:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi,
[somehow your mails do not get through to my private account, so I'm
switching]
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Clarification: I can't precisely tell what code is executed in VM mode,
as
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 16:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi,
[somehow your mails do not get through to my private account, so I'm
switching]
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Clarification: I can't precisely tell what code is executed in
Bugs item #1818600, was opened at 2007-10-23 16:51
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1818600group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi,
[somehow your mails do not get through to my private account, so I'm
switching]
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Clarification: I can't precisely tell what code is executed in VM mode,
as
Avi Kivity wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Please post a disassembly of your vmx_vcpu_run so we can interpret the
offsets.
Here it comes:
2df0 vmx_vcpu_run:
2df0: 55 push %ebp
2df1: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:06 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
PATCH 2 moves all the rest of the flatfile rules to
config-x86-common.mak. So nothing gets clobbered.
But THIS patch clobbers it.
Oh, It does not clobber flatfiles. It uses it. So in
config-x86-common.mak there is a rule
From ac4dd1782b9f0f51e0c366a1b8db4515d6828df8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sheng Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:34:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Enable memory mapped TPR shadow(FlexPriority)
This patch based on CR8/TPR patch before, and enable the TPR
shadow(FlexPriority) for
ok I can resend this anyway . I forgot to consolidate the kvmctl stuff.
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 16:10 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 15:41 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
+flatfiles_tests-common = test/bootstrap test/vmexit.flat test/smp.flat
Instead of
Another comment: I forgot if I answer the question on why eip should
move backward.
I did it because some instruction like mov will move eip to skip some
dst/src operand
when executing, so eip should be kept for consistency.
Yang, Sheng wrote:
From ac4dd1782b9f0f51e0c366a1b8db4515d6828df8 Mon
This is the acutally the 3rd attempt.
These patches consolidate the make files tests in user director for x86. This
is to allow other architectures easier integration into the kvm source.
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
