On Feb 8, 2008 5:01 AM, Christian Borntraeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they
> describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make
> alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and
>
>|I want to be able to "connect" and initiate a guest in a *script*
>|(so it can be done automatically when the host boots), and then allow
>|users (without admin privileges) to access the guest graphically. Is
>|this a reasonable mode of operation? If so, how do I do it? If I call
>|qemu-kvm
On Sunday 10 February 2008, you wrote:
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > struct vring_used
> > {
> > __u16 flags;
> > __u16 idx;
> > + __u32 padding;
> > struct vring_used_elem ring[];
> > -};
> > +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> >
>
> This padding that you've put in is n
>Well, but it seems, now the virtual machine no longer finds
>a network device anymore.
Hmmm. Some version info would have been handy (e.g. using kvm-60, using
Linux kernel 2.8.12).
Kvm-60 emulates the 8139 LAN card by default, not the NE2000 of earlier
versions. Check which card you have by swi
Hi Christian,
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> struct vring_used
> {
> __u16 flags;
> __u16 idx;
> + __u32 padding;
> struct vring_used_elem ring[];
> -};
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
>
This padding that you've put in is not something that would normally
occur on x86.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bob Tennent
Sent: Fri 08/02/2008 17:54
To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [kvm-devel] script initiation and user access of host system
Hi. I want to be able to "connect" and initiate a guest in a *script*
(so it can be done automatically when the ho
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kay Hayen
Sent: Sat 09/02/2008 14:12
To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [kvm-devel] KVM migration problem on Ubuntu
Hello people,
I have a Ubuntu gutsy minimal VM made as a testing environment for our system
software. In the mean time, I upgraded to
On Friday 08 February 2008, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Currently the virtio_ring structure are not declared packed, but they
> describe an hardware like interface. We should not allow compilers to make
> alignments and optimizations that can be different between the guest and
> host compile
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:
> PG_mlock is on the way and can easily be reused for this, too.
Note that a pinned page is different from an mlocked page. A mlocked page
can be moved through page migration and/or memory hotplug. A pinned page
must make both fail.
* Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> def_bool X86_64
>
> -select HAVE_KVM
> +config HAVE_KVM
> + def_bool y
i think it might be better to just move the select to after the "config
X86" option. (this is a legitimate use of select) Sam, do you c
Current git for me (b1d0e4f535e10775cffde922208b49629169aeaa) doesn't
let me build KVM. In fact, I don't seem to have *ANY* kvm-related
symbols in my .config at all.
I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by putting some
comments in it. It seems to me like just putting:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > The VM shouldn't break if try_to_unmap doesn't actually make the page
> > freeable for whatever reason. Permanent pins shouldn't happen anyway,
>
> VM is livelo
Hello people,
I have a Ubuntu gutsy minimal VM made as a testing environment for our system
software. In the mean time, I upgraded to Hardy, largely driven by the hope
that it will improve certain issues I had.
Well, but it seems, now the virtual machine no longer finds a network device
anymo
13 matches
Mail list logo
