[kvm-devel] s390 kvm_virtio.c build error

2008-05-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
Commit c45a6816c19dee67b8f725e6646d428901a6dc24 (virtio: explicit advertisement of driver features) and commit e976a2b997fc4ad70ccc53acfe62811c4aaec851 (s390: KVM guest: virtio device support, and kvm hypercalls) don't like each other: <-- snip --> ... CC drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.o /h

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 20/52] KVM: Add missing #include

2008-01-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:10:06AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Needed for empty_zero_page. > > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c

Re: [kvm-devel] 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: kvm compile breakage with X86_CMPXCHG64=n

2007-06-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:03:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:22:24 -0400 > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration > > This makes builds fail sooner if something is implicitly defined instead > > of having to wait half an hou

[kvm-devel] 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: kvm compile breakage with X86_CMPXCHG64=n

2007-06-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.22-rc4-mm1: >... > git-kvm.patch >... > git trees >... I'm getting the following compile error with CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=n (with -Werror-implicit-function-declaration - otherwise it would be a link error):

[kvm-devel] [2.6 patch] drivers/kvm/mmu.c: fix an if() condition

2007-04-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
It might have worked in this case since PT_PRESENT_MASK is 1, but let's express this correctly. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/drivers/kvm/mmu.c.old 2007-04-28 18:05:13.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2/drivers/kvm/mmu.c 20

[kvm-devel] 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches (v2)

2007-01-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19 with patches available If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any othe

Re: [kvm-devel] 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-01-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 07:32:46AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19 > > with patches available. > > > Subject: KVM: guest crash > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/8/163 > > Submitter : Roland Dreier <[EMAIL

[kvm-devel] 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-01-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19 with patches available. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any oth

[kvm-devel] 2.6.20-rc4: known regressions with patches (v3)

2007-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19 with patches available. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any oth

[kvm-devel] 2.6.20-rc2: known regressions with patches available

2006-12-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19 with patches available If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any othe