On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 05:18 -0800, SourceForge.net wrote:
>
>
> KVM works really slowly when doing anything.
> however it works EVEN SLOWER when the kvm-intel module is loaded!!!
>
> vmware is like 10 times faster the KVM but people on ubuntu forums are saying
> that their implimentation of KV
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 21:23 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does kvm try to support 64-bit guests on a 32-bit host kernel? (64-bit
> CPU of course)
>
> It looks to me like this patch might prevent that scenario.
No it doesn't, but this patch wouldn't prevent it any more than other
parts of the
Build currently fails with x86.
Index: kernel/kvm_main.c
===
--- kernel/kvm_main.c (revision 4381)
+++ kernel/kvm_main.c (working copy)
@@ -1148,6 +1148,7 @@
kvm_arch_ops->decache_regs(vcpu);
ret = -KVM_EINVAL;
+
Being able to boot Ubuntu's liveCD from KVM is fairly important to me at
this point.
We use a bootsplash, and I don't think that's going to change. We do
have alternate install CD's, but they don't boot to a live session,
where people can test things (plus virtualization technologies like KVM
prov
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 09:36 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > Trying to test out kvm for Ubuntu, and am running into problems. I've
> > used kvm-11 and 2.6.20-git plus the 5 patches sent to lkml today. Result
> > is the same:
> >
> >
Trying to test out kvm for Ubuntu, and am running into problems. I've
used kvm-11 and 2.6.20-git plus the 5 patches sent to lkml today. Result
is the same:
# kvm -hda vdisk.img -cdrom Edgy-i386-Desktop.iso -boot d -m 384
kvm_run: Invalid argument
Dmesg only shows:
[ 3440.904376] kvm: msrs: 2
A
