Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x?
>> wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too?
>>
>
> Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would
>> be better to witch gcc-4.x?
>
> Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers,
> KVM develo
Farkas Levente wrote:
> ps. anyway it's planed to be temporary or permanent to use a qemu fork
> for kvm and not try to propagate changes back to the upstream qemu?
>
The plan is to submit everything to upstream qemu.
--
Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
--
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 21:49 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >
> >> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would
> >> be better to witch gcc-4.x?
> >
> > Sure. Are you volunteering? ;)
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would
>> be better to witch gcc-4.x?
>
> Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers,
> KVM developers, and the comm
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:27 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> ok but now as qemu code was imported into kvm, then it's probably would
> be better to witch gcc-4.x?
Sure. Are you volunteering? ;) I'm sure both upstream QEMU developers,
KVM developers, and the community using either would be most
ap
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x?
>> wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too?
>
> Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code. It takes a
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x?
> wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too?
Its actually an issue with QEMUs cpu emulation code. It takes advantage
of compiler traits that
hi,
what's the real reason that kvm can't be compiled gcc-4.x?
wouldn't it be better to be able to compile with the current compilers too?
SourceForge.net wrote:
> Bugs item #1807620, was opened at 2007-10-04 18:25
> Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
> Yo
Bugs item #1807620, was opened at 2007-10-04 18:25
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1807620&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
10 matches
Mail list logo
