Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Attached patch implements lazy-fpu save/restore for VT. VMEXIT time
>> improves by about 10% (~550 cycles). I had to do a couple more things
>> to get it working than I had to do with SVM. I changed the CR0 host
>> mask to be all
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Attached patch implements lazy-fpu save/restore for VT. VMEXIT time
> improves by about 10% (~550 cycles). I had to do a couple more things
> to get it working than I had to do with SVM. I changed the CR0 host
> mask to be all 1's so that any attempt to wri
Howdy,
Attached patch implements lazy-fpu save/restore for VT. VMEXIT time
improves by about 10% (~550 cycles). I had to do a couple more things
to get it working than I had to do with SVM. I changed the CR0 host
mask to be all 1's so that any attempt to write to CR0 causes a VMEXIT.
I do
