Looks good (the whole series).
Needs some good testing of course... Have you tested migration/loadvm?
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:47:12AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It's a little odd to use signals to raise a notification on a file descriptor
when we can just work directly with a file
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Looks good (the whole series).
Needs some good testing of course... Have you tested migration/loadvm?
No, but I will before resubmitting (which should be sometime tomorrow).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:47:12AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It's a little odd to use signals to raise a notification on a file descriptor
when we can just work directly with a file descriptor instead. This patch
converts the SIGUSR1 based notification in the io-thread to instead use an
eventfd file descriptor. If eventfd isn't available, we use a pipe()
