Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> While it has served us well, it is long overdue that we eliminate the
>> virtio-net tap hack. It turns out that zero-copy has very little
>> impact on
>> performance. The tap hack was gaining such a significant performance
>> boost
>> not becau
Anthony Liguori wrote:
While it has served us well, it is long overdue that we eliminate the
virtio-net tap hack. It turns out that zero-copy has very little impact on
performance. The tap hack was gaining such a significant performance boost
not because of zero-copy, but because it avoided dro
While it has served us well, it is long overdue that we eliminate the
virtio-net tap hack. It turns out that zero-copy has very little impact on
performance. The tap hack was gaining such a significant performance boost
not because of zero-copy, but because it avoided dropping packets on receive
