Dor Laor wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 15:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> Patchset looks good and reduces some nasty hacks. It probably also
> improves other devices like e1000 et al.
>
Yeah, we just need to make sure they have proper can_receive handlers.
I took a quick look at the
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 15:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Normally, tap always reads packets and simply lets the client drop them if it
> cannot receive them. For virtio-net, this results in massive packet loss and
> about an 80% performance loss in TCP throughput.
>
> This patch modifies qemu
Normally, tap always reads packets and simply lets the client drop them if it
cannot receive them. For virtio-net, this results in massive packet loss and
about an 80% performance loss in TCP throughput.
This patch modifies qemu_send_packet() to only deliver a packet to a VLAN
client if it doesn'
