I think that it would be nicer to implement the p9 transport on top of
virtio instead of directly on top of PCI. I think your PCI transport
would make a pretty nice start of a PCI virtio transport though.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 13:52 -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> F
>> > This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
>> > paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
>>
>> Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
>> concept.
>>
>
>Yes. I'm looking at the patches from Dor now, it should be pretty
>straight forw
On 8/28/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
>
> > This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
> > paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
>
> Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a
On 8/28/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
>
> > This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
> > paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
>
> Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a
On Tuesday 28 August 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
> paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Nice driver. I'm hoping we can do a virtio driver using a similar
concept.
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_9P 0x5002
> +#de
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:52:38PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> +config NET_9P_PCI
> + depends on NET_9P
> + tristate "9p PCI Shared Memory Transport (Experimental)"
shouldn't this depend on CONFIG_PCI?
-
This
From: Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This adds a shared memory transport for a synthetic 9p device for
paravirtualized file system support under KVM/QEMU.
Signed-off-by: Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/filesystem
