Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think we should hold off on this sort of patch at first. I know it
improves performance, but it's very hack-ish. I have a similar patch[1]
that improves performance more but is even more hack-ish.
I think we have to approach this by not special cases virtio-net to
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think we should hold off on this sort of patch at first. I know it
improves performance, but it's very hack-ish. I have a similar
patch[1] that improves performance more but is even more hack-ish.
I think we have to approach this by not special
Dor Laor wrote:
From f244bcad756c4f761627557bb7f315b1d8f22fb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:26:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [VIRTIO-NET] Rx performance improvement
The current performance are not good enough, the problem lies
in qemu tap
From f244bcad756c4f761627557bb7f315b1d8f22fb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:26:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [VIRTIO-NET] Rx performance improvement
The current performance are not good enough, the problem lies
in qemu tap handling code that
