Re: [kvm-devel] [kvm-ppc-devel] Current e500 kvm guest kernel booting log

2007-12-19 Thread Zhang Wei
> > Hollis already pointed me to the mkasm-values patches which > are the continuation of the mkasm-offset discussion on lkml > Hollis last patch was based on. > As stated before by Xiantao and Hollis in this thread the > mkasm-value patches are not yet accepted upstream, but may be > useful f

Re: [kvm-devel] [kvm-ppc-devel] Current e500 kvm guest kernel booting log

2007-12-18 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hollis already pointed me to the mkasm-values patches which are the continuation of the mkasm-offset discussion on lkml Hollis last patch was based on. As stated before by Xiantao and Hollis in this thread the mkasm-value patches are not yet accepted upstream, but may be useful for us. Based on

Re: [kvm-devel] [kvm-ppc-devel] Current e500 kvm guest kernel booting log

2007-12-17 Thread Zhang, Xiantao
Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:15 +0800, Zhang Wei wrote: >>> Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:14 +0800, Zhang Wei wrote: >> From: Hollis Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] We haven't touched the "hack" code recently, since we've been