Kevin Pedretti wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:29 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Patch looks good, but I'm missing a signed-off-by: line.
>>
>> Eddie, can you also take a look?
>>
>
> I split the patch in two. The first one fixes the host OS kernel
> divide by zero problem. The second cl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:29 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Patch looks good, but I'm missing a signed-off-by: line.
>>
>> Eddie, can you also take a look?
>
> I split the patch in two. The first one fixes the host OS kernel
> divide by zero problem. The second cleans up
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 11:29 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Patch looks good, but I'm missing a signed-off-by: line.
>
> Eddie, can you also take a look?
I split the patch in two. The first one fixes the host OS kernel
divide by zero problem. The second cleans up apic_get_tmcct() a bit.
Both now incl
Kevin Pedretti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While booting a non-Linux OS under kvm-46, I noticed that reading
> APIC_TMCCT before initializing APIC_TDCR to something other than its
> boot time value would lead to a host kernel divide by zero exception.
> It's due to apic->timer.divide_count being set to 0 at b
Hi,
While booting a non-Linux OS under kvm-46, I noticed that reading
APIC_TMCCT before initializing APIC_TDCR to something other than its
boot time value would lead to a host kernel divide by zero exception.
It's due to apic->timer.divide_count being set to 0 at boot... it should
be set to 2 sinc
