On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:27:51AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/)
wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping
with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or
something else along those
Caleb Moore wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
Hi Xiantao,
Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was
made available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Thanks for your suggestions. It is a surely good idea to create a
IA64 mailing list to talk about the IA64-KVM. But now we have to rebase
them to latest commits before sending out, since the kvm source layout
changed much recently. Once the final source layout comes
Hi,
We are interested in an IA64 port of KVM, either experimenting with
someone else's or writing our own. I've tried getting in contact with Yu
Fenghua of Intel but it seems that we will be unable to get hold of
their source code until it is in the main tree.
Is such a merge likely in the near
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 18:21 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Caleb Moore wrote:
Is such a merge likely in the near future or should we proceed in
creating our own port?
Hi, Caleb
We have completed kvm IA64 port until the end of Aug, and showed a
demo in kvm forum of Aug. Then, we
Akio Takebe wrote:
Hi, Alex and Xiantao
Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was
made available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel
mailing list too (such as ppc has already). Thanks,
Hi, Alex and Xiantao
Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was made
available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel mailing list
too (such as ppc has already). Thanks,
I also think so. :)
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
Hi Xiantao,
Perhaps more people would be able to help restructure the tree to
support more architectures if a snapshot of the kvm/ia64 code was made
available. We might want to think about a kvm-ia64-devel mailing list
too (such
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 09:29 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
H, Alex/Akio
Thanks for your suggestions. It is a surely good idea to create a
IA64 mailing list to talk about the IA64-KVM. But now we have to rebase
them to latest commits before sending out, since the kvm source layout
changed
I agree.
My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/)
wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping
with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or
something else along those lines. We've already got an open source
Itanium
10 matches
Mail list logo
