Avi Kivity wrote:
> The new capability bitmap moves the patch out of the "very trivial"
> realm. I removed those hunks and applied.
Thanks.
> Send more, the approach is clearly right. Leave things which require
> changes (like the capability bitmap) to the end, there's more than
> enough stuf
Carsten Otte wrote:
> Thanks to Avi's continued review, we've got even more common code this
> time: KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl is now completely handled in kvm_main.c
> instead of having arch callbacks to check extensions. The architectures
> are expected to setup a bit mask named KVM_ARCH_EXTENSIO
To give a statement from other architectures I wanted to say that this patch is
fine for the power port.
>From my view it is the small and easy-to-review flavor of the big patch series
>I once sent to the list.
And because Carsten and I sit in the same office these patches are usually
reviewed/d
Thanks to Avi's continued review, we've got even more common code this
time: KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl is now completely handled in kvm_main.c
instead of having arch callbacks to check extensions. The architectures
are expected to setup a bit mask named KVM_ARCH_EXTENSIONS with
information about ca
