Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> (Yes, I know, it's again another bug I've introduced into KVM...)
>>
>>
>
> To avoid this, I suggest that Nitin and yourself review each other's
> patches. While I review every patch I commit, it works much better when
> someone who's involved daily
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> (Yes, I know, it's again another bug I've introduced into KVM...)
>
>
To avoid this, I suggest that Nitin and yourself review each other's
patches. While I review every patch I commit, it works much better when
someone who's involved daily with the code reviews the pa
Correct me if I'm wrong, perhaps it's the bug Nitin is hunting.
There is always something wrong in the management in the REP prefix.
I think what is happen is:
- we have a REP prefix, we save ECX and EIP.
- we set c->dst to emulate a "stos"
- goto writeback
- writeback: we try a "write_emulated(
Hi,
booting a FC6 on my intel box (xeon) with a kernel 2.6.22.5 and KVM git, I had
the following error (not reproducible):
# kvm-userspace/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda fc6.qcow2 -net nic
-net tap -serial stdio -smp 4
...
INIT: version 2.86 booting
Welcome to Fedora
