Dhirendra Pal Singh wrote:
> I got the latest snapshot of qemu and sure enough there was e1000
> driver support in it.. Though I didn't see much difference between
> RealTek Driver Vs e1000...
> Following was the test result...
>
> Copying 1GB file
> real3m48.284s
> user0m0.072s
> sys
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 15:30 -0700, Dhirendra Pal Singh wrote:
> > I tried e1000 and it says "qemu: Unsupported NIC: e1000" :( Did I
> > miss something.. ?
> >
> > I downloaded the latest code base for qemu, and I see the
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 15:30 -0700, Dhirendra Pal Singh wrote:
> I tried e1000 and it says "qemu: Unsupported NIC: e1000" :( Did I
> miss something.. ?
>
> I downloaded the latest code base for qemu, and I see the following
> lines in qemu-doc.texi
>
> *
> @code{i82551},
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Jorge Lucángeli Obes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your help.. man
> >
> > So, the performance numbers with public bridge, actually increases the
> > performance by many folds. Now I can copy the same 1 gb file in 1.30mins..
> > which is awesome.
> Thanks a lot for your help.. man
>
> So, the performance numbers with public bridge, actually increases the
> performance by many folds. Now I can copy the same 1 gb file in 1.30 mins..
> which is awesome.
Cool!
> Now a dumb question (sorry :( ), but how do I use e1000 nic device and
> driver.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:13 -0700, Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Dhirendra Pal Singh
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I am trying to evaluate, kvm at my work for vi
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We published virtio network drivers for Linux but not yet for Windows.
> Our virtio drivers for windows are almost done (for rev#1), we'll surely
> release the binaries for them.
great!! no need to fool around with xen/vmwa
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:13 -0700, Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Dhirendra Pal Singh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I am trying to evaluate, kvm at my work for virtual support in our product..
> >
> > I had setup up a windows guest, in my ubuntu
sure.. I am going to do bridged networking next thing and re-run my test and
see where I get..
Thanks for the info... I am using rtl8139 driver as windows 2003 server
wasn't recognizing the default one...
*
the very best would be to have paravirtualized drivers on windows...
there's some
Thanks for the tip.. okay.. I am going to set up the public bridge in that
case.. and see what can I do..
Yes I am being forced to use windows guest... :(
I am a die hard linux fan and hasn't used windows for almost 3 -4 years
now..
Will update you guys again after I do the test..
Thanks for a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Dhirendra Pal Singh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am trying to evaluate, kvm at my work for virtual support in our product..
>
> I had setup up a windows guest, in my ubuntu host, on hardware with Intel VT
> support.
>
> Now when I try to download a 1
Hi Guys,
I am trying to evaluate, kvm at my work for virtual support in our product..
I had setup up a windows guest, in my ubuntu host, on hardware with Intel VT
support.
Now when I try to download a 1 GB file present, inside windows virtual
machine, using samba, from a another linux box, I ge
12 matches
Mail list logo
