Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>
hi,
it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit
centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working
if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but i
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>> it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit
>>> centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working
>>> if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower w
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit
>> centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working
>> if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower with 2 guests
>> 4 vcpu then kvm-36 with 2
Farkas Levente wrote:
> hi,
> it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit
> centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working
> if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower with 2 guests
> 4 vcpu then kvm-36 with 2 guests single cpu. is so
hi,
it seems the latest kvm-50 working with smp both with 32 and 64 bit
centos-5 are now running (ie not crash), what's more it's even working
if i trun back (ie on) acpi. but it seems much more slower with 2 guests
4 vcpu then kvm-36 with 2 guests single cpu. is so much slower then it
can be recog
