Shahar Frank wrote:
> Milas,
>
> What host are you using, and what Vista version is it? Is it an OEM
> version or other non standard version?
>
> Vista is known to use some new ACPI features, and in fact some licensing
> options require ACPI 2.0 (not supported).
>
> Shahar
>
>
Using linux 2.6
Milas,
What host are you using, and what Vista version is it? Is it an OEM
version or other non standard version?
Vista is known to use some new ACPI features, and in fact some licensing
options require ACPI 2.0 (not supported).
Shahar
Wayde Milas wrote:
>
>>
>> This is probably some kind of copy protection device, it's making sure
>> you're upgrading to the same machine and not to a different one. So
>> most likely this is by design.
>>
> Maybe... but define "different one". The ultimate upgrade comes with
> its own unique
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Wayde Milas wrote:
>
>> This is a weird one. Using kvm27. I am able to install and run winxp 32
>> bit perfectly. The problem arises when I try and run my Vista Ultimate
>> upgrade. You cannot cold boot the upgrade and install on a blank drive
>> because when you enter the
Wayde Milas wrote:
> This is a weird one. Using kvm27. I am able to install and run winxp 32
> bit perfectly. The problem arises when I try and run my Vista Ultimate
> upgrade. You cannot cold boot the upgrade and install on a blank drive
> because when you enter the activation code, the softwar
This is a weird one. Using kvm27. I am able to install and run winxp 32
bit perfectly. The problem arises when I try and run my Vista Ultimate
upgrade. You cannot cold boot the upgrade and install on a blank drive
because when you enter the activation code, the software checks to make
sure ther
