Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't guilt refresh before sending. I'll have to modify my
> patchbomb
> script to check for that to avoid this in the future.
>
> Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all
> VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all
> VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead take a struct kvm. This
> makes things a bit more clear.
>
> The main thing that was confusing me was whether certain functions need to be
>
