Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390

2007-11-14 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity: But isn't account_system_time() called via the timer tick interrupt, and never directly from kvm? So in_interrupt() would always be true. Ouch, yes. Please dont use that patch, I will make a new one. Christian

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390

2007-11-14 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christian Borntraeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Avi, Ingo, Laurent, what do you think about the following patch? fine to me. I guess this should mostly be a NOP to KVM, right? Ingo - This SF.net email is

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Fix accounting of interrupts during guest execution on s390

2007-11-14 Thread Avi Kivity
Christian Borntraeger wrote: Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar: * Christian Borntraeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Avi, Ingo, Laurent, what do you think about the following patch? fine to me. I guess this should mostly be a NOP to KVM, right? Yes,