Rusty Russell wrote:
> Dynamically allocate vcpus
>
> This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm" to a pointer
> array, and changes the "vcpu_create" and "vcpu_setup" hooks into one
> "vcpu_create" call which does the allocation and initialization of the
> vcpu (calling back into the kvm_vc
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:39 +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> So with this patch, we no longer have limitation on the number of
> vcpus running in a VM?
Well, the #define needs to be changed, but that's a trivial matter.
If we want it really big, we should look at dynamic reallocation of the
Hi Rusty,
So with this patch, we no longer have limitation on the number of
vcpus running in a VM?
Thanks,
Jun
On 7/27/07, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:56 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm" to a linked list
>
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:56 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm" to a linked list
> of VCPUs
... and here's the version which leaves it as an array (of pointers).
Oops.
==
Dynamically allocate vcpus
This patch converts the vcpus array in "struct kvm"
